Web personalization for user acceptance of technology: An empirical investigation of E-government services

E-Commerce firms have adopted Web Personalization techniques extensively in the form of recommender systems for influencing user behavior for customer retention. Although there are numerous studies in this area, academic research addressing the role of Web Personalization in user acceptance of technology is very scant. Further, owing to the potential of recommender systems to attract and retain customers, most studies in web personalization have been done in E-Commerce setting. In this research, the ‘Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology’ theory proposed in previous research has been extended to include web personalization as a moderator and has been tested in an E-Government context. Data collection involved conducting a laboratory experiment with the treatment group receiving personalized web forms for requesting an E-Government service. Our analyses show that personalizing the Web by self-reference and content relevance has a significant moderator role in influencing the relationship between determinants of intention to use and behavioral intention in certain cases.

[1]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Identifying early adopters of new IT products: A case of Windows 95 , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[2]  John Riedl,et al.  Recommender systems in e-commerce , 1999, EC '99.

[3]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[4]  Reza Rafeh,et al.  Recommender Systems in ECommerce , 2017 .

[5]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Implementing Core IS Capabilities:: Feeny–Willcocks IT Governance and Management Framework Revisited , 2006 .

[7]  Mohamed Ramzy Zakaria,et al.  Personalized E-government System: Towards an Adaptive Maturity Model , 2015 .

[8]  Dong Li,et al.  A Model for E-Government Information Resource Integration Based on Ontology , 2012 .

[9]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[10]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing , 1997 .

[11]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[13]  Hele-Mai Haav,et al.  A Semantic Method of Automatic Composition of E-Government Services , 2012, DB&IS.

[14]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[15]  Li Sheng,et al.  Application of Ontology in E-Government , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government.

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Does Animation Attract Online Users' Attention? The Effects of Flash on Information Search Performance and Perceptions , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  I-Ching Hsu,et al.  Personalized web feeds based on ontology technologies , 2011, Information Systems Frontiers.

[21]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The New Age of Innovation: Driving Cocreated Value Through Global Networks , 2008 .

[22]  Rachel Silcock What is E-government , 2001 .

[23]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[24]  Saji K. Mathew,et al.  Web personalization research: an information systems perspective , 2013, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[25]  J. Hair Research Methods for Business , 2007 .

[26]  Doaa Taha,et al.  e-Government Implementation in a Developing Country: A Case Study , 2012 .

[27]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[28]  Laila Benhlima,et al.  How semantic technologies transform e-government domain , 2014 .

[29]  Megha Garg,et al.  Development of ontology from Indian agricultural e-governance data using IndoWordNet: a semantic web approach , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[30]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[33]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[34]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[35]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[36]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[37]  Magda Huisman,et al.  Semantic-driven e-government: A case study of formal representation of government domain ontology , 2011, 2011 IST-Africa Conference Proceedings.

[38]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice , 2008 .

[39]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[40]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  myGrid: personalised bioinformatics on the information grid , 2003, ISMB.

[41]  George A. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Semantic Web Technologies in e - Government , 2012 .

[42]  Zhongfu Wu,et al.  Personalisation in web computing and informatics: Theories, techniques, applications, and future research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[43]  Dinesh A. Mirchandani,et al.  Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[44]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[45]  Liquan Han,et al.  Application and research on ontology in e-Government workflow model , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering.

[46]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Generic User Modeling Systems , 2001, User modeling and user-adapted interaction.

[47]  Richard Lai,et al.  A method for simplifying the submission of an online request for an E-Government service , 2014, 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies.

[48]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Automatic personalization based on Web usage mining , 2000, CACM.

[49]  Jun Zhao,et al.  An Ontology Model for User-Centered e-Government in China , 2013 .

[50]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  Si Guangyun Ontology based personalized catalog system of e-government information resource , 2012 .

[52]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers' Product Understanding , 2007, MIS Q..