Skin comfort of base layer wool garments. Part 3: The effect of ethnicity on perceptions of comfort using Chinese and Australian wearers

There is commercial interest in designing wool next-to-skin garments specifically for the domestic Chinese market. However, the current understanding of comfort has largely been obtained from studies with Caucasian wearers and its applicability to Chinese wearers is unknown. A study was undertaken that examined the tactile, thermal and moisture-based sensations of two groups of untrained female wearers drawn from an urban population in Australia: 25 Chinese wearers who had been born in China to Chinese parents and 23 control wearers. Sensations were recorded during a series of activities in a range of controlled climatic environments while wearing next-to-skin garments made from different fiber types (wool and cashmere) and different fiber diameters (15.5–20.3 µm). There is no evidence from this experiment to conclude that Chinese wearers are more sensitive in their discomfort, prickle and scratch response than the control wearers. They recorded lower scores and smaller increases in scores in response to activity, environment and garment type than the control wearers. For sensations that relate to the feel of garments against the skin, the Chinese group experienced increased sensation in comparison to the control group during a range of motion activities, for the 20.3 µm wool garment only. For sensations that relate to the thermophysiological state of the body, the control group experienced increased sensation as temperature and activity rose in comparison to the Chinese group. These differences in the sensational responses to activity and environment were associated with similar responses in discomfort scores.

[1]  N. Crowcroft,et al.  Describing race, ethnicity, and culture in medical research , 1996, BMJ.

[2]  R. Westerman,et al.  Identification of the physical stimulus and the neural basis of fabric-evoked prickle. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Maryam Naebe,et al.  Relationship between wearer prickle response with fibre and garment properties and Wool ComfortMeter assessment , 2013 .

[4]  Maryam Naebe,et al.  Relationships between wearer assessment and the instrumental measurement of the handle and prickle of knitted wool fabrics , 2015 .

[5]  Jane Speijers,et al.  Skin comfort of base layer wool garments. Part 2: Fiber diameter effects on fabric and garment prickle , 2014 .

[6]  Ramasamy Alagirusamy,et al.  Science in Clothing Comfort , 2010 .

[7]  A. K. Roy Choudhury,et al.  Factors affecting comfort: human physiology and the role of clothing , 2011 .

[8]  Hyunsik Kim,et al.  Fabric Hand as Perceived by U.S. and Korean Males and Females , 1996 .

[9]  John F. Fuzek Some factors affecting the comfort assessment of knit T-shirts , 1981 .

[10]  John Stanton,et al.  Skin comfort of base layer knitted garments. Part 1: Description and evaluation of wearer test protocol , 2014 .

[11]  L. Marks,et al.  Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  Style Matters: Ethnicity, race, and culture: guidelines for research, audit, and publication , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  L. Arendt-Nielsen,et al.  Ethnic differences in oro-facial somatosensory profiles-quantitative sensory testing in Chinese and Danes. , 2013, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  F. S. Kilinc-Balci,et al.  Testing, analyzing and predicting the comfort properties of textiles , 2011 .

[15]  Yi Li,et al.  Neural Network Predictions of Human Psychological Perceptions of Clothing Sensory Comfort , 2003 .

[16]  F. Keefe,et al.  Changing Face of Pain: Evolution of Pain Research in Psychosomatic Medicine , 2002, Psychosomatic medicine.