Impact of a new motion-correction algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography in patients with insufficient heart rate control.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Michael Fiechter | Julia Stehli | Oliver Gaemperli | Bert-Ram Sah | J. Stehli | T. Fuchs | R. Buechel | P. Kaufmann | Michael Fiechter | O. Gaemperli | B. Sah | Philipp A Kaufmann | Svetlana Dougoud | Sacha Bull | Tobias A Fuchs | Ronny R Buechel | S. Bull | S. Dougoud | Bert-Ram Sah
[1] B. Hamm,et al. Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy: Comparison of Results With Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-to-Head Pilot Investigation , 2009, Circulation.
[2] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.
[3] J. Affeldt,et al. The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.
[4] T. Callister,et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[5] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[6] P. Kaufmann. Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] V. Treyer,et al. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography , 2009, Heart.
[8] Jed D. Pack,et al. Coronary artery motion estimation and compensation: A feasibility study , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.
[9] W. Sribney,et al. Estimation of means, totals, ratios, and proportions for survey data , 1997 .
[10] I. Burger,et al. Validation of a new contrast material protocol adapted to body surface area for optimized low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[11] J. Singer,et al. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .
[12] Maria Iatrou,et al. Nonrigid registration-based coronary artery motion correction for cardiac computed tomography. , 2012, Medical physics.
[13] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.
[14] Michael Fiechter,et al. CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[15] J. Stehli,et al. Image quality in low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with a new high-definition CT scanner , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[16] V. Treyer,et al. Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering: feasibility in a large population. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] L. Husmann,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. , 2009, European heart journal.
[18] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.
[19] M. Vembar,et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[20] C. Gaudio,et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[21] L. Husmann,et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[22] Michael Frankfurter,et al. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis Modeling Change And Event Occurrence , 2016 .
[23] James K Min,et al. Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[24] A. Pazhenkottil,et al. Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[25] J. R. Landis,et al. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.
[26] S. Achenbach,et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.
[27] R. Frye,et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.
[28] Borut Marincek,et al. Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: dependency on heart rate -- implications for CT image reconstruction. , 2007, Radiology.
[29] Michael Fiechter,et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[30] Borut Marincek,et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[31] M. Reiser,et al. Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[32] J. Leipsic,et al. Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.