Impact of a new motion-correction algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography in patients with insufficient heart rate control.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering allows coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scanning with low radiation dose but requires heart rates below 63 beats/min. We assessed the impact of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and interpretability of low-dose CCTA acquired despite insufficient heart rate control. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 40 patients undergoing CCTA for the assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease who did not reach the target heart rate below 63 beats/min despite β-blockade before prospective low-dose scanning, the temporal acquisition window was increased (80 ms additional padding). The new algorithm detects and integrates vessel path and velocity from adjacent cardiac phases for motion correction. Two blinded observers assessed image quality on a 4-point Likert scale (1, nonevaluative; 2, reduced but evaluative; 3, good; and 4, excellent) and the fraction of interpretable segments (score 2 or more) using motion correction versus standard reconstruction. RESULTS Image reconstruction with motion correction resulted in an increased median coronary artery image quality score (excellent interobserver agreement, κ = 0.85) compared to standard reconstruction (3.4 vs. 3.0, P < .001). Consequently, motion-corrected reconstruction significantly improved the overall interpretability of coronary arteries (from 78% to 88%, P < .001). Estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.3 ± 0.8 mSv. CONCLUSIONS A novel, vendor-specific, motion-corrected, reconstruction algorithm improves image quality and interpretability of prospectively ECG-triggered low-dose CCTA despite insufficient heart rate control.

[1]  B. Hamm,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy: Comparison of Results With Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-to-Head Pilot Investigation , 2009, Circulation.

[2]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.

[3]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.

[4]  T. Callister,et al.  SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  P. Kaufmann Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  V. Treyer,et al.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography , 2009, Heart.

[8]  Jed D. Pack,et al.  Coronary artery motion estimation and compensation: A feasibility study , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[9]  W. Sribney,et al.  Estimation of means, totals, ratios, and proportions for survey data , 1997 .

[10]  I. Burger,et al.  Validation of a new contrast material protocol adapted to body surface area for optimized low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[11]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Maria Iatrou,et al.  Nonrigid registration-based coronary artery motion correction for cardiac computed tomography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[14]  Michael Fiechter,et al.  CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  J. Stehli,et al.  Image quality in low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography with a new high-definition CT scanner , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  V. Treyer,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering: feasibility in a large population. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  L. Husmann,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. , 2009, European heart journal.

[18]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[19]  M. Vembar,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  C. Gaudio,et al.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  L. Husmann,et al.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[22]  Michael Frankfurter,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis Modeling Change And Event Occurrence , 2016 .

[23]  James K Min,et al.  Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[24]  A. Pazhenkottil,et al.  Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[25]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[26]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[27]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[28]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: dependency on heart rate -- implications for CT image reconstruction. , 2007, Radiology.

[29]  Michael Fiechter,et al.  Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[30]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[32]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.