Child and family safety device affordability by country income level: an 18 country comparison

Objective: To compare availability, urban price, and affordability of child/family safety devices between 18 economically diverse countries. Design: Descriptive: urban price surveys by local safety organisations or shoppers. Setting: Retail stores and internet vendors. Main outcome measures: Prices expressed in US dollars, and affordability measured by hours of factory work needed to buy a child safety seat, a belt-positioning booster seat, a child bicycle helmet, and a smoke alarm. Results: Prices of child and family safety devices varied widely between countries but the variation for child safety seats and bicycle helmets did not relate strongly to country income. Safety devices were expensive, often prohibitively so, in lower income countries. Far more hours of factory work were required to earn a child safety device in lower income than middle income, and middle income than higher income, countries. A bicycle helmet, for example, cost 10 hours of factory work in lower income countries but less than an hour in higher income countries. Smoke alarms and booster seats were not available in many lower income countries. Conclusions: Bicycles and two-axle motor vehicles were numerous in lower and middle income countries, but corresponding child safety devices were often unaffordable and sometimes not readily available. The apparent market distortions and their causes merit investigation. Advocacy, social marketing, local device production, lowering of tariffs, and mandatory use legislation might stimulate market growth. Arguably, a moral obligation exists to offer subsidies that give all children a fair chance of surviving to adulthood.

[1]  P Conrad,et al.  Helmets, injuries and cultural definitions: motorcycle injury in urban Indonesia. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  D A Sleet,et al.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase use of child safety seats. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Åke Nygren,et al.  Transportation, traffic safety and health - man and machine , 2000 .

[4]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  The scientific basis of injury prevention and control - Section Four: Introduction , 2004 .

[5]  T. Miller,et al.  Cost outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: a primer on methods. , 1997, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[6]  Patricia Capdevielle International Comparisons of Hourly Compensation Costs , 1989 .

[7]  D R Thom,et al.  Evaluation and replication of impact damage to bicycle helmets. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  T. Miller,et al.  Reducing Highway Crash Costs: The Cost-Outcome Analyses , 2000 .

[9]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Child Seats: How Large are the Benefits and Who Should Pay? , 1993 .

[10]  D. Thompson,et al.  Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries. A case-control study. , 1996, JAMA.

[11]  T. Miller,et al.  Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. , 2000, Medical care.

[12]  D. Durbin,et al.  Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  J D Langley,et al.  Head injuries to bicyclists and the New Zealand bicycle helmet law. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  W. Chadbunchachai,et al.  Effect of the helmet act for motorcyclists in Thailand. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  F. LeClere,et al.  Injury prevention measures in households with children in the United States, 1990. , 1994, Advance data.

[16]  Frederick P. Rivara,et al.  Effectiveness of Bicycle Safety Helmets in Preventing Head Injuries , 1996 .