Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke

Background and Purpose: Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching has emerged as an evaluative measure of upper-extremity motor performance in people after stroke. However, the psychometric properties supporting the use of kinematic data for evaluating longitudinal change in motor performance have not been established. The objective of this study was to determine, in a test-retest reliability manner, the reproducibility and minimal detectable change for reaching kinematics in people after stroke. Subjects and Methods: Fourteen participants with hemiparesis after stroke performed forward reaching tasks on 2 occasions 37.3 (SD=9.8) days apart. At each session, participants performed 4 forward reaching tasks produced by the combination of 2 target heights (low and high [109 and 153 cm from the floor, respectively]) and 2 instructed movement speeds (self-selected and as fast as possible). Two analytical methods were used to calculate kinematic parameters. Results: Relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) ranged from .04 to .99, and absolute reliability (standard error of measurement) ranged from 2.7% to 76.8%, depending on the kinematic variable, the demands of the motor task (target height and movement speed), and the analytical method. Bland-Altman analysis, a statistical method used to assess the repeatability of a method, revealed few systematic errors between sessions. The minimal detectable change ranged from 7.4% to 98.9%. Discussion and Conclusion: Depending on the demands of the motor task and the analytical method, most kinematic outcome measures (such as peak hand velocity, endpoint error, reach extent, maximum shoulder flexion range of motion, and minimum elbow extension range of motion) are reliable measures of motor performance in people after stroke. However, because of the magnitude of within-subject measurement error, some variables (such as peak hand velocity, time to peak hand velocity, and movement time) must change considerably (>50%) to indicate a real change in individual participants. The results of our reliability analysis, which are based on our cohort of participants with hemiparesis after stroke and our specific paradigm, may not be generalizable to different subpopulations of people with hemiparesis after stroke or to the myriad movement tasks and kinematic variables used for the assessment of reaching performance in people after stroke.

[1]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Orit Shechtman,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd Edition, Leslie Gross Portney, Mary P. Watkins. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2000), 752 pages. $60 , 2001 .

[4]  P. Stratford,et al.  Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[5]  B Shea,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  J. Fritz,et al.  A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[7]  W. T. Thach,et al.  How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  B Kirshner,et al.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[10]  D. Gravel,et al.  Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  C Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  A marker-based measurement procedure for unconstrained wrist and elbow motions. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability and responsiveness of elbow trajectory tracking in chronic poststroke hemiparesis. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  P. Pigeon,et al.  Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Eliseo Stefano Maini,et al.  Using Kinematic Analysis to Evaluate Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  R. Craik,et al.  Determining meaningful changes in gait speed after hip fracture. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[16]  C. Trombly Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  J. French,et al.  Motor recovery following acute stroke. , 1990, Age and ageing.

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  Short-Term Effects of Practice With Trunk Restraint on Reaching Movements in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Controlled Trial , 2004, Stroke.

[19]  S. Haley,et al.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[20]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Performance in Subjects With Poststroke Hemiparesis During the First Few Months of Recovery , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[21]  C. T. Leonard,et al.  Correlation between impairment and motor performance during reaching tasks in subjects with spastic hemiparesis. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  Silvano Mior,et al.  Muscle Testing, Techniques of Manual Examination , 1985 .

[23]  C. Trombly,et al.  Observations of improvement of reaching in five subjects with left hemiparesis. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  D. Downham,et al.  How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[25]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[27]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[29]  A. Gentile,et al.  Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[33]  S. Haley,et al.  Evaluation of a Community-Based Group Fitness Program for Children With Disabilities , 2006, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[34]  Darcy S. Reisman,et al.  Workspace location influences joint coordination during reaching in post-stroke hemiparesis , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Recovery of Grasp versus Reach in People with Hemiparesis Poststroke , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[37]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[38]  S. Walt,et al.  Reliability of upper and lower limb three-dimensional kinematics in children with hemiplegia. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[39]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[40]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  W. Rymer,et al.  Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  P. Lum,et al.  Reliability of Dynamic Muscle Performance in the Hemiparetic Upper Limb , 2005, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[44]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[45]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[46]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[47]  D. Wade,et al.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. , 1986, International rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  M. Levin Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  Heleen Beckerman,et al.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness , 2001, Quality of Life Research.

[50]  E. Roth,et al.  The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification. , 1998, Stroke.

[51]  John P Scholz,et al.  Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  M. Levin,et al.  Task-Specific Training With Trunk Restraint on Arm Recovery in Stroke: Randomized Control Trial , 2006, Stroke.

[54]  J. Eng,et al.  Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[56]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  The acquisition of coordination: Preliminary analysis of learning to write , 1989 .

[57]  M. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[58]  Jeffery J. Summers,et al.  Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[59]  M. Levin,et al.  The development of coordination for reach-to-grasp movements in children , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[61]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[63]  B. Bussel,et al.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients , 2003, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.