Influence of bolt tightening torque, wire size, and component reuse on wire fixation in circular external fixation.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of bolt torque, wire size, and component reuse on the ability to maintain wire tension in 3 external skeletal fixation systems. STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical study. METHODS Yield strength in tension of 1.0-, 1.2-, 1.5-, and 1.6-mm-diameter wires, and yield strength in torque of Hofmann Small Bone Fixation (SBF) cannulated and slotted bolts and IMEX regular and miniature bolts were determined on a testing machine. The minimum bolt tightening torque needed to prevent wire slippage at clinically recommended wire tensions was determined. Components were tested 10 times, and loads at slippage were recorded. RESULTS The IMEX system required a mean of 8 Nm of bolt tightening torque to maintain 900 N (1.6-mm wires). The SBF system required a mean of 3 Nm bolt torque to maintain 300 N (1.0-mm wires) and 5 Nm to maintain 600 N (1.2-mm wires). The SBF cannulated bolt required 9 Nm of torque to maintain 900 N (1.5-mm wires). The SBF slotted bolts could only maintain 800 N before yield. The IMEX miniature system required a mean bolt torque of 1.1 Nm to maintain 300 N. The cannulated and slotted bolts from both manufacturers failed to maintain 70% of initial wire tension after 7 and 4 uses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The IMEX systems and the SBF system using 1.0- and 1.2-mm wires could maintain clinically recommended wire tension safely. Only the IMEX system could maintain clinically recommended wire tension safely using 1.5- or 1.6-mm wires. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The SBF system using 1.0- and 1.2-mm wires and the IMEX system using all wire sizes can maintain clinically relevant wire tension. The SBF system using 1.5-mm wires could not. Cannulated and slotted bolts should not be used more than 6 and 3 times, respectively. Nuts should not be reused.

[1]  A. Cross,et al.  Axial characteristics of circular external skeletal fixator single ring constructs. , 2001, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[2]  A. Cross,et al.  Effects of ring diameter and wire tension on the axial biomechanics of four-ring circular external skeletal fixator constructs. , 2001, American journal of veterinary research.

[3]  M. Samchukov,et al.  Biomechanics of circular external skeletal fixation. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[4]  J. Aronson,et al.  Mechanical Induction of Osteogenesis: The Importance of Pin Rigidity , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  W. Rand,et al.  Mechanical comparison of two external fixator clamp designs. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[6]  O. Lanz,et al.  Initial Clinical Experience with the IMEX™ Circular External Skeletal Fixation System , 1999, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[7]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  O. Lanz,et al.  Initial Clinical Experience with the IMEX™ Circular External Skeletal Fixation System , 1999, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[9]  K. Kraus,et al.  Type-II external fixation, using new clamps and positive-profile threaded pins, for treatment of fractures of the radius and tibia in dogs. , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[10]  A J Harrison,et al.  The yielding of tensioned fine wires in the Ilizarov frame , 1998, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.