The dependence of the response of cat spindle Ia afferents to sinusoidal stretch on the velocity of concomitant movement.

1. The responses of de‐efferented soleus muscle spindle primary afferents to 1 Hz sinusoidal stretches, which were superimposed on triangular background movements of intermediate amplitude (1.2 mm, half peak‐to‐peak) and widely varying speed, were recorded in anaesthetized cats. 2. Compared with control responses to the same sinusoids applied at fixed mean muscle length, the sensitivity to small (50 and 100 microns, half peak‐to‐peak), but not to large (1000 microns), sinusoidal movements was dramatically reduced during concomitant stretching, unless the background movements were extremely slow (well below 0.005 resting lengths per second). 3. For small stretches (50 and 100 microns) the reduction of sensitivity caused by background movement depended on the speed of this movement. For the highest velocity studied (1.6 mm s‐1, corresponding to about 0.03 resting lengths per second) sensitivity dropped to below 10% of the control values. 4. The functional implication is that the sensitivity of spindle Ia afferents to small irregularities of voluntary movements (of any but the slowest speeds) may well be very much lower than it has hitherto been inferred from the striking sensitivity to minute disturbances at fixed mean muscle length. The present finding clearly puts extra demands on the gain of any spinal or central reflex actions of the sensory feedback from spindle afferents. 5. The effect is interpreted in terms of the widely accepted cross‐bridge hypothesis of spindle small‐movement sensitivity. The result suggests that in de‐efferented intrafusal muscle fibres, which are subjected to imposed stretches, connected cross‐bridges (conveying a friction‐like property to the contractile fibre poles) may exist not only in a state of permanent attachment, but also in a dynamic equilibrium between stretch‐induced detachment and reattachment. Indirect evidence further suggests that the duration of this disruption and reattachment cycle is of the order of 1 s.

[1]  J. Houk,et al.  Transition in sensitivity of spindle receptors that occurs when muscle is stretched more than a fraction of a millimeter. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C C Hunt,et al.  Fusimotor after‐effects on responses of primary endings to test dynamic stimuli in cat muscle spindles. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Kirkwood,et al.  The frequency response of frog muscle spindles under various conditions , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P. Matthews,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  C C Hunt,et al.  An analysis of receptor potential and tension of isolated cat muscle spindles in response to sinusoidal stretch. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Y. Laporte,et al.  Effects of slow muscle stretch on the responses of primary and secondary endings to small amplitude periodic stretches in de-efferented soleus muscle spindles , 1980, Brain Research.

[7]  M Hulliger,et al.  Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M Hulliger,et al.  The responses of primary spindle afferents to fusimotor stimulation at constant and abruptly changing rates. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Hulliger,et al.  After-effects of fusimotor stimulation on spindle la afferents' dynamic sensitivity, revealed during slow movements , 1982, Brain Research.

[10]  A Prochazka,et al.  Muscle spindle function during normal movement. , 1981, International review of physiology.

[11]  F. Emonet-Dénand,et al.  Effects of stretch on dynamic fusimotor after‐effects in cat muscle spindles. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  C. Marsden,et al.  Servo action in the human thumb. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P. Matthews Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. K. Hill,et al.  Tension due to interaction between the sliding filaments in resting striated muscle. the effect of stimulation , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Hulliger,et al.  The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control. , 1984, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[16]  P. Zangger,et al.  ‘Fusimotor set’: new evidence for α-independent control of γ-motoneurones during movement in the awake cat , 1985, Brain Research.

[17]  J. Cabelguen Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of spindle primary endings to sinusoidal stretches in the cat , 1979, Brain Research.

[18]  M. Hulliger,et al.  Temporal characteristics of the sensitivity-enhancing after-effects of fusimotor activity on spindle la afferents , 1983, Brain Research.

[19]  M. Hulliger,et al.  Fusimotor »Set« vs. α-γ Linkage in Voluntary Movement in Cats , 1983 .

[20]  M. C. Brown,et al.  The responses of frog muscle spindles and fast and slow muscle fibres to a variety of mechanical inputs , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  C. Hunt,et al.  Responses of primary and secondary endings of isolated mammalian muscle spindles to sinusoidal length changes. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[23]  R. Poppele,et al.  Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Muscle spindle discharge in normal and obstructed movements. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  R. Poppele,et al.  A determination of static mechanical properties of intrafusal muscle in isolated cat muscle spindles , 1979, Neuroscience.

[26]  J C Houk,et al.  Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J. Houk,et al.  Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[29]  M Hulliger,et al.  Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of IA fibres to low frequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  R. Stein Peripheral control of movement. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[31]  M Hulliger,et al.  The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency‐response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  W. Cleveland LOWESS: A Program for Smoothing Scatterplots by Robust Locally Weighted Regression , 1981 .

[33]  P. Matthews,et al.  After‐effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings , 1969, The Journal of physiology.