Detecting Narrativity Across Long Time Scales

Storytelling is a universal human practice that serves as a key site of education, collective memory, fostering social belief systems, and furthering human creativity. It can occur in different discursive domains for different social purposes with differing degrees of intensity. In this project, we develop computational methods for measuring the degree of narrativity in over 335,000 text passages distributed across twoto three-hundred years of history and four separate discursive domains (fiction, non-fiction, science, and poetry). We show how these domains are strongly differentiated according to their degree of narrative communication and, second, how truth-based discourse has declined considerably in its utilization of narrative communication. These findings suggest that there has been a long-term historical differentiation between the practices of knowing and telling, which raises important questions with respect to the social acceptance of both science and the arts.

[1]  R. Shiller,et al.  Narrative economics: how stories go viral and drive major economic events , 2021, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[2]  T. Underwood,et al.  NovelTM Datasets for English-Language Fiction, 1700-2009 , 2020 .

[3]  Meir Sternberg,et al.  Telling in Time (I): Chronology and Narrative Theory , 1990 .

[4]  Federico Pianzola Looking at Narrative as a Complex System: The Proteus Principle , 2018 .

[5]  G. Genette,et al.  Boundaries of Narrative , 1976 .

[6]  Kathleen McKeown,et al.  Modeling Reportable Events as Turning Points in Narrative , 2015, EMNLP.

[7]  David Herman,et al.  Basic elements of narrative , 2009 .

[8]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Kunst der Gesellschaft , 1997 .

[9]  Sonja Zeman Grammatik der Narration , 2020 .

[10]  Frank Keller,et al.  Movie Plot Analysis via Turning Point Identification , 2019, EMNLP.

[11]  Emily Kubin,et al.  Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  W. Labov,et al.  Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. , 1997 .

[13]  Kate G. Blackburn,et al.  The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis , 2020, Science Advances.

[14]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  A Corpus and Cloze Evaluation for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Stories , 2016, NAACL.

[15]  Meir Sternberg,et al.  Telling in Time (II): Chronology, Teleology, Narrativity , 1992 .

[16]  Elke Teich,et al.  The Royal Society Corpus: From Uncharted Data to Corpus , 2016, LREC.

[17]  Rachel Giora,et al.  Degrees of narrativity and strategies of semantic reduction , 1994 .

[18]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement , 1999 .

[19]  H. White The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality , 1980, Critical Inquiry.

[20]  A. Baer Narrative Discourse An Essay In Method , 2016 .

[21]  M. Workman,et al.  Strategic narratives in climate change: Towards a unifying narrative to address the action gap on climate change , 2017 .

[22]  J. Bruner The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[23]  H. Maibom Social Systems , 2007 .

[24]  Betsy Rymes,et al.  Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling , 2005, Language in Society.

[25]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  CaTeRS: Causal and Temporal Relation Scheme for Semantic Annotation of Event Structures , 2016, EVENTS@HLT-NAACL.

[26]  Paul Ricœur Time and Narrative, Volume 1 , 1988 .

[27]  M. Bal,et al.  Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative , 1988 .

[28]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Event Chains , 2008, ACL.