Compositional Verification of a Multi-Agent System for One-to-Many Negotiation

Verification of multi-agent systems hardly occurs in design practice. One of the difficulties is that required properties for a multi-agent system usually refer to multi-agent behaviour which has nontrivial dynamics. To constrain these multi-agent behavioural dynamics, often a form of organisational structure is used, for example, for negotiating agents, by following strict protocols. The claim is that these negotiation protocols entail a structured process that is manageable with respect to analysis, design and execution of such a multi-agent system. In this paper this is shown by a case study: verification of a multi-agent system for one-to-many negotiation in the domain of load balancing of electricity use. A compositional verification method for multi-agent systems is applied that allows to (1) logically relate dynamic properties of the multi-agent system as a whole to dynamic properties of agents, and (2) logically relate dynamic properties of agents to properties of their subcomponents. Given that properties of these subcomponents can be verified by more standard methods, these logical relationships provide proofs of the dynamic properties of the multi-agent system as a whole.

[1]  Jan Treur,et al.  A semantical perspective on verification of knowledge , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[2]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems in Temporal Multi-Epistemic Logic , 1998, ATAL.

[3]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers , 1994 .

[4]  Jacques Ferber,et al.  Organization models and behavioural requirements specification for multi-agent systems , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[5]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  A Methodology and Modelling Technique for Systems of BDI Agents , 1996, MAAMAW.

[6]  Zohar Manna,et al.  Temporal verification of reactive systems - safety , 1995 .

[7]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation , 1994, AI Mag..

[8]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Agent-based software engineering , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..

[9]  Martín Abadi,et al.  Composing Specifications , 1989, REX Workshop.

[10]  Rune Gustavsson,et al.  HOMEBOTS : Intelligent Decentralized Services for Energy Management , 1996 .

[11]  Rune Gustavsson,et al.  Requirements on Information Systems as Business Enablers , 1997 .

[12]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Specification and Verification of Knowledge-Based Systems , 1996 .

[13]  Jozef Hooman.  Compositional verification of a distributed real-time arbitration protocol , 2005, Real-Time Systems.

[14]  John S. Gero,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98 , 1998, Springer Netherlands.

[15]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Agents negotiating for load balancing of electricity use , 1998, Proceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183).

[16]  Zohar Manna,et al.  Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems , 1995, Springer New York.

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design , 2000, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[19]  Axel van Lamsweerde,et al.  Formal refinement patterns for goal-driven requirements elaboration , 1996, SIGSOFT '96.

[20]  Wu Yuan.  A Methodology for Agent-oriented Analysis and Design , 2003 .

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  On agent-based software engineering , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the Formal Specification and Verification of Multi-Agent Systems , 1997, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[23]  D. Christie,et al.  The Logic of Time: A Model-Theoretic Investigation into the Varieties of Temporal Ontology and Temporal Discourse , 1985 .

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Formal Specification of Multi-Agent Systems: A Real-World Case , 1995, ICMAS.

[25]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Principles of component-based design of intelligent agents , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[26]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Design of Collaborative Information Agents , 2000, CIA.

[27]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems in Temporal Multi-Epistemic Logic , 1998, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[28]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Dynamics and control in component‐based agent models , 2002, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[29]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Assumptions of Problem-Solving Methods and their Role in Knowledge Engineering , 1996, ECAI.

[30]  Jan Treur,et al.  Temporal Semantics of Compositional Task Models and Problem Solving Methods , 1999, Data Knowl. Eng..

[31]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems: A Formal Analysis of Pro-activeness and Reactiveness , 2002, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jan Treur,et al.  A Logical Foundation for Verification , 1994, ECAI.