Task-Difficulty Homeostasis in Car Following Models: Experimental Validation Using Self-Paced Visual Occlusion

Car following (CF) models used in traffic engineering are often criticized for not incorporating “human factors” well known to affect driving. Some recent work has addressed this by augmenting the CF models with the Task-Capability Interface (TCI) model, by dynamically changing driving parameters as function of driver capability. We examined assumptions of these models experimentally using a self-paced visual occlusion paradigm in a simulated car following task. The results show strong, approximately one-to-one, correspondence between occlusion duration and increase in time headway. The correspondence was found between subjects and within subjects, on aggregate and individual sample level. The long time scale aggregate results support TCI-CF models that assume a linear increase in time headway in response to increased distraction. The short time scale individual sample level results suggest that drivers also adapt their visual sampling in response to transient changes in time headway, a mechanism which isn’t incorporated in the current models.

[1]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[2]  Rob Gray,et al.  A Two-Point Visual Control Model of Steering , 2004, Perception.

[3]  N. Kinnear,et al.  Driving as you feel : a psychological investigation of the novice driver problem , 2006 .

[4]  Richard A. Young,et al.  Cognitive Distraction While Driving: A Critical Review of Definitions and Prevalence in Crashes , 2012 .

[5]  T. Ranney Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development , 1999 .

[6]  John W. Senders,et al.  THE ATTENTIONAL DEMAND OF AUTOMOBILE DRIVING , 1967 .

[7]  W. V. Winsum THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN CAR FOLLOWING MODELS , 1999 .

[8]  Elsevier Sdol Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 2009 .

[9]  Huei Peng,et al.  Development of an errorable car-following driver model , 2010 .

[10]  Neil K Chaudhary,et al.  The influence of roadway situation, other contextual factors, and driver characteristics on the prevalence of driver secondary behaviors , 2016 .

[11]  Tuomo Kujala,et al.  The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[12]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Towards Understanding Motivational and Emotional Factors in Driver Behaviour: Comfort Through Satisficing , 2007 .

[14]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Incorporating human-factors in car-following models : a review of recent developments and research needs , 2014 .

[15]  Simon Washington,et al.  Revisiting the Task-Capability interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models , 2015 .

[16]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[17]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Incorporating driver distraction in car-following models: Applying the TCI to the IDM , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[18]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[19]  E. Boer Car following from the driver’s perspective , 1999 .

[20]  Xuesong Zhou,et al.  Simplified, data-driven, errorable car-following model to predict the safety effects of distracted driving , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[21]  David H. Weir,et al.  New Results in Driver Steering Control Models , 1977 .

[22]  W. Bablok,et al.  A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[23]  G. Zou Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[24]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Driver distraction: A review of the literature , 2003 .

[25]  J Godthelp Precognitive control: open- and closed-loop steering in a lane-change manoeuvre. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[26]  Ray Fuller,et al.  Driver Control Theory , 2011 .

[27]  Edmund Donges,et al.  A Two-Level Model of Driver Steering Behavior , 1978 .

[28]  R. Fuller Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  David N. Lee,et al.  Where we look when we steer , 1994, Nature.

[30]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Future path and tangent point models in the visual control of locomotion in curve driving. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[31]  Iisakki Kosonen,et al.  HUTSIM - URBAN TRAFFIC SIMULATION AND CONTROL MODEL: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS , 1999 .