Strain specificity and cholinergic modulation of visuospatial attention in three inbred mouse strains

The tremendous increase in the use of mouse inbred strains and mutant mice to study the molecular basis of psychiatric disorders urges for a better understanding of attentional performance in mice. To this aim, we investigated possible strain differences in performance and cholinergic modulation of visuospatial attention in three widely used mouse inbred strains (129S2/SvHsd, C57BL/6JOlaHsd and DBA/2OlaHsd) in the five‐choice serial reaction time task. Results indicated that after extended training, performance of 129S2/SvHsd mice was superior to that of C57BL/6JOlaHsd and DBA/2OlaHsd mice in terms of attention, omission errors, inhibitory control and latencies to correct choice. Increasing the attentional load resulted in comparable decrements in attention in all strains and inhibitory control impairments that were most pronounced in DBA/2OlaHsd mice. Further pharmacological evaluation indicated that all strains showed attentional impairments after treatment with the muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists scopolamine and mecamylamine, respectively. 129S2/SvHsd mice were less sensitive, whereas DBA/2OlaHsd mice appeared more sensitive to the detrimental effects of mecamylamine. In addition, subchronic, but not acute, nicotine treatment slightly improved attentional performance in all strains to the same extent. In conclusion, our data indicate strain specificity with particularly good performance of 129S2/SvHsd mice and strong cholinergic involvement in visuospatial attention in mice.

[1]  P. Asherson,et al.  Attentional performance of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice in the 5-choice serial reaction time task , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  M. Carli,et al.  Reduced attention and increased impulsivity in mice lacking NPY Y2 receptors: Relation to anxiolytic-like phenotype , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  L. Vanderschuren,et al.  Behavioral disinhibition requires dopamine receptor activation , 2006, Psychopharmacology.

[4]  W. B. Siesser,et al.  Transgenic mice expressing a human mutant β1 thyroid receptor are hyperactive, impulsive, and inattentive , 2006, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[5]  Marc Jamon,et al.  Attack behaviors in mice: from factorial structure to quantitative trait loci mapping. , 2005, European journal of pharmacology.

[6]  M. Carli,et al.  Phencyclidine-induced impairment in attention and response control depends on the background genotype of mice: reversal by the mGLU2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[7]  S. Dunnett,et al.  Behavioural profiles of inbred mouse strains used as transgenic backgrounds. II: cognitive tests , 2004, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[8]  Trevor W Robbins,et al.  Cortical cholinergic function and deficits in visual attentional performance in rats following 192 IgG-saporin-induced lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  L. Wilkinson,et al.  Common Genetic Effects on Variation in Impulsivity and Activity in Mice , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  John Sharkey,et al.  Nicotine Improves Sustained Attention in Mice: Evidence for Involvement of the α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  C. Spielewoy,et al.  Strain-Specificity in Nicotine Attenuation of Phencyclidine-Induced Disruption of Prepulse Inhibition in Mice: Relevance to Smoking in Schizophrenia Patients , 2004, Behavior genetics.

[12]  S. Dunnett,et al.  Free operant and discrete trial performance of mice in the nine-hole box apparatus: validation using amphetamine and scopolamine , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  F. Holsboer,et al.  Reduced attention in mice overproducing corticotropin-releasing hormone , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  J. Gugten,et al.  Operant learning and differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 36-s responding in 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor knockout mice , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  T. Robbins,et al.  The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[16]  Thomas Steckler,et al.  Cholinergic blockade impairs performance in operant DNMTP in two inbred strains of mice , 2002, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[17]  M. Shoaib,et al.  Nicotine-induced enhancement of attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: the influence of task demands , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[18]  T. Robbins,et al.  Selective Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects of Cholinergic Lesions Produced by Intrabasalis Infusions of 192 IgG-Saporin on Attentional Performance in a Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Kõks,et al.  Strain and gender differences in the behavior of mouse lines commonly used in transgenic studies , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  G. Higgins,et al.  Effect of subtype selective nicotinic compounds on attention as assessed by the five-choice serial reaction time task , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  D. Sanger,et al.  Characterisation of the effects of nicotine in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats: antagonist studies , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[22]  I. Stolerman,et al.  The role of nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in attention , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[23]  L. Wilkinson,et al.  Visuospatial attentional functioning in mice: interactions between cholinergic manipulations and genotype , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Strain-dependent involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in muscarinic cholinergic influences on memory storage , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  Ian P. Stolerman,et al.  Nicotine enhances sustained attention in the rat under specific task conditions , 1998, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  J. Wehner,et al.  Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses , 1997, Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Wehner,et al.  Assessment of locomotor activity, acoustic and tactile startle, and prepulse inhibition of startle in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: Implications of genetic background for single gene and quantitative trait loci analyses , 1997, Neuroscience.

[28]  Allan Collins,et al.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies , 1997, Psychopharmacology.

[29]  A. C. Collins,et al.  Inbred mouse strains vary in oral self-selection of nicotine , 1996, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  G. Higgins,et al.  Effect of scopolamine on visual attention in rats , 1995, Psychopharmacology.

[31]  J. Muir,et al.  Reversal of visual attentional dysfunction following lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain by physostigmine and nicotine but not by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron , 1995, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  B. Everitt,et al.  AMPA-induced excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain: a significant role for the cortical cholinergic system in attentional function , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  A. C. Collins,et al.  Genotype influences the development of tolerance to nicotine in the mouse. , 1991, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[34]  T. Robbins,et al.  Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  Martin Sarter,et al.  Choline transporters, cholinergic transmission and cognition , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.