Understanding the team derailment process: A look at team skill and attitude deficiencies

There have been many attempts to enhance team effectiveness. However, even the most effective teams have the potential to go off track, or derail. This chapter describes an attempt to understand why top performing teams venture down the road to team derailment. Specifically, we describe four instances in which real world teams have derailed. Guided by the team competency framework offered by Cannon-Bowers, Tannenbaum, Salas and Volpe (1995), we identify a set of deficient team skills and attitudes associated with each team's declined performance. Lessons learned about how to prevent other teams from derailing are also shared.

[1]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. , 1998 .

[2]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Understanding the Sources of Faulty Group Decision Making , 1988 .

[4]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[5]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  An Analysis of Team Evolution and Maturation , 1993 .

[6]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[7]  David G. Mathiasen.  Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[8]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[9]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[10]  Addie Ehrenstein,et al.  Training for a rapidly changing workplace : applications of psychological research , 1997 .

[11]  E. Salas,et al.  Military Team Research: 10 Years of Progress , 1995 .

[12]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[13]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[14]  Christopher P. Neck,et al.  Group Decision Fiascoes Continue: Space Shuttle Challenger and a Revised Groupthink Framework , 1991 .

[15]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[16]  Elizabeth L. Blickensderfer.  Training teams to self-correct : effects of intra-team feedback on team shared understanding and coordinated task accomplishment , 1996 .

[17]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. , 1997 .

[19]  D. Vaughan.  Autonomy, Interdependence, and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle "Challenger.". , 1990 .

[20]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Helping team members help themselves: propositions for facilitating guided team self-correction , 2000 .

[21]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[22]  Pat Riley.  The Winner Within: A Life Plan for Team Players , 1993 .

[23]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .