Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency

We studied the influence of frequency on sound localization in free-flying barn owls by quantifying aspects of their target-approaching behavior to a distant sound source during ongoing auditory stimulation. In the baseline condition with a stimulus covering most of the owls hearing range (1–10 kHz), all owls landed within a radius of 20 cm from the loudspeaker in more than 80% of the cases and localization along the azimuth was more accurate than localization in elevation. When the stimulus contained only high frequencies (>5 kHz) no changes in striking behavior were observed. But when only frequencies from 1 to 5 kHz were presented, localization accuracy and precision decreased. In a second step we tested whether a further border exists at 2.5 kHz as suggested by optimality models. When we compared striking behavior for a stimulus having energy from 2.5 to 5 kHz with a stimulus having energy between 1 and 2.5 kHz, no consistent differences in striking behavior were observed. It was further found that pre-takeoff latency was longer for the latter stimulus than for baseline and that center frequency was a better predictor for landing precision than stimulus bandwidth. These data fit well with what is known from head-turning studies and from neurophysiology.

[1]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  On the barn owl’s visual pre-attack behavior: I. Structure of head movements and motion patterns , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  T. Derting,et al.  Physical and Behavioral Correlates of Prey Vulnerability to Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Predation , 1989 .

[3]  Early Growth and Development of the Common Barn-Owl's Facial Ruff , 1988 .

[4]  M Fabiana Kubke,et al.  Bigger Brains or Bigger Nuclei? Regulating the Size of Auditory Structures in Birds , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[5]  D. Eilam,et al.  Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  G. Klump,et al.  Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  E. Batschelet.  Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[8]  Terry T. Takahashi,et al.  The synthesis and use of the owl’s auditory space map , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  M. Konishi,et al.  Representation of sound localization cues in the auditory thalamus of the barn owl. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Terry T. Takahashi,et al.  Prediction of auditory spatial acuity from neural images on the owl's auditory space map , 2003, Nature.

[11]  H. Wagner,et al.  Sound-localization deficits induced by lesions in the barn owl's auditory space map [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1993 Apr;13(4):following table of contents] , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  How the Owl Tracks Its Prey , 2012 .

[13]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl’s ears , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Klaus Hartung,et al.  Head-related transfer functions of the barn owl: measurement and neural responses , 1998, Hearing Research.

[15]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Binaural tuning of auditory units in the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields of the barn owl: local organization but no space map , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Konishi,et al.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Stereoscopic depth perception in the owl , 1998, Neuroreport.

[18]  M. Konishi,et al.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  B. J. Arthur.  Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Hermann Wagner.  Sound-localization Experiments in Owls , 1995 .

[21]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Sound-Localization Experiments with Barn Owls in Virtual Space: Influence of Interaural Time Difference on Head-Turning Behavior , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  L. R. Dice.  Minimum Intensities of Illumination Under Which Owls Can Find Dead Prey by Sight , 1945, The American Naturalist.

[23]  P F Knudsen,et al.  Parallel pathways mediating both sound localization and gaze control in the forebrain and midbrain of the barn owl , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  F. Fischer.  Quantitative TEM analysis of the barn owl basilar papilla , 1994, Hearing Research.

[25]  K. Saberi,et al.  Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl , 2006, Nature.

[27]  R. Payne.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[28]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Disruption of auditory spatial working memory by inactivation of the forebrain archistriatum in barn owls , 1996, Nature.

[31]  Andrew Moiseff,et al.  Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  J A Mazer,et al.  How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Eilam,et al.  Movement and direction of movement of a simulated prey affect the success rate in barn owl Tyto alba attack , 2004 .

[34]  J. Schnupp,et al.  Sound localization behavior in ferrets: Comparison of acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses , 2008, Neuroscience.

[35]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Mechanisms of sound localization in the barn owl (Tyto alba) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[36]  Avinash D. S. Bala,et al.  Auditory Spatial Acuity Approximates the Resolving Power of Space-Specific Neurons , 2007, PloS one.

[37]  H. Wagner,et al.  In-flight corrections in free-flying barn owls (Tyto alba) during sound localization tasks , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Locatable and Nonlocatable Acoustic Signals for Barn Owls , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[39]  H. Wagner,et al.  Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Ocular aberrations in barn owl eyes , 2007, Vision Research.

[41]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Maps versus clusters: different representations of auditory space in the midbrain and forebrain , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  E. A. Whitchurch,et al.  Combined auditory and visual stimuli facilitate head saccades in the barn owl (Tyto alba). , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Cross-Correlation in the Auditory Coincidence Detectors of Owls , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Konishi,et al.  Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  B. Grothe,et al.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. , 2010, Physiological reviews.

[47]  K Saberi,et al.  How do owls localize interaurally phase-ambiguous signals? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Representation of frequency in the primary auditory field of the barn owl forebrain. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Geoffrey A. Manley,et al.  An auditory fovea in the barn owl cochlea , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  G. M. Klump,et al.  Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: a comparison with other owls , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[51]  T Trinath,et al.  Influence of stimulus level on acoustic motion-direction sensitivity in barn owl midbrain neurons. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  D. R. Wylie,et al.  Echolocation, vocal learning, auditory localization and the relative size of the avian auditory midbrain nucleus (MLd) , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[53]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Binaural processing in the synthesis of auditory spatial receptive fields , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[54]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Forebrain pathway for auditory space processing in the barn owl. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  R. B. Coles,et al.  Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba) , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[56]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Sound localization by the barn owl (Tyto alba) measured with the search coil technique , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[58]  David McAlpine,et al.  Optimal neural population coding of an auditory spatial cue , 2004, Nature.

[59]  G. Fasano,et al.  A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test , 1987 .

[60]  Andrew Moiseff,et al.  Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[61]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of broadband interaural level difference on head-turning behavior , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.