Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing

There is growing interest in voxelated matter that is designed and fabricated voxel by voxel1–4. Currently, inkjet-based three-dimensional (3D) printing is the only widely adopted method that is capable of creating 3D voxelated materials with high precision1–4, but the physics of droplet formation requires the use of low-viscosity inks to ensure successful printing5. By contrast, direct ink writing, an extrusion-based 3D printing method, is capable of patterning a much broader range of materials6–13. However, it is difficult to generate multimaterial voxelated matter by extruding monolithic cylindrical filaments in a layer-by-layer manner. Here we report the design and fabrication of voxelated soft matter using multimaterial multinozzle 3D (MM3D) printing, in which the composition, function and structure of the materials are programmed at the voxel scale. Our MM3D printheads exploit the diode-like behaviour that arises when multiple viscoelastic materials converge at a junction to enable seamless, high-frequency switching between up to eight different materials to create voxels with a volume approaching that of the nozzle diameter cubed. As exemplars, we fabricate a Miura origami pattern14 and a millipede-like soft robot that locomotes by co-printing multiple epoxy and silicone elastomer inks of stiffness varying by several orders of magnitude. Our method substantially broadens the palette of voxelated materials that can be designed and manufactured in complex motifs. Voxelated soft matter is designed and fabricated using multimaterial multinozzle three-dimensional printing, which switches between different viscoelastic inks along the same print filament to print multiple materials simultaneously.

[1]  A. Studart,et al.  3D Printing of Materials with Tunable Failure via Bioinspired Mechanical Gradients , 2018, Advanced materials.

[2]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Richard Stainsby,et al.  Pressure loss equations for laminar and turbulent non-newtonian pipe flow , 1998 .

[4]  J. Lewis,et al.  Printing soft matter in three dimensions , 2016, Nature.

[5]  Mark Schenk,et al.  Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.

[7]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Origami Metamaterials for Tunable Thermal Expansion , 2017, Advanced materials.

[8]  Koryo Miura,et al.  The Science of Miura-Ori: A Review , 2009 .

[9]  Vincent Tournat,et al.  Reconfigurable origami-inspired acoustic waveguides , 2016, Science Advances.

[10]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Rational design of reconfigurable prismatic architected materials , 2017, Nature.

[11]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D‐Printing of Lightweight Cellular Composites , 2014, Advanced materials.

[12]  Thomas J Ober,et al.  Active mixing of complex fluids at the microscale , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction   , 2017 .

[14]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[15]  John J. Vericella,et al.  High‐Throughput Printing via Microvascular Multinozzle Arrays , 2013, Advanced materials.

[16]  Sebastien G M Uzel,et al.  Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels , 2019, Science Advances.

[17]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D Printing of Liquid Crystal Elastomeric Actuators with Spatially Programed Nematic Order , 2018, Advanced materials.

[18]  Thomas J Ober,et al.  Microfluidic Printheads for Multimaterial 3D Printing of Viscoelastic Inks , 2015, Advanced materials.

[19]  J. R. Raney,et al.  Hybrid 3D Printing of Soft Electronics , 2017, Advanced materials.

[20]  Ahmed Hosny,et al.  Making data matter: Voxel printing for the digital fabrication of data across scales and domains , 2018, Science Advances.

[21]  J. Lewis,et al.  3D Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell‐Laden Tissue Constructs , 2014, Advanced materials.

[22]  Michael C. McAlpine,et al.  3D printed quantum dot light-emitting diodes. , 2014, Nano letters.

[23]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Bioinspired hierarchical composite design using machine learning: simulation, additive manufacturing, and experiment , 2018 .

[24]  Reza Nezafat,et al.  From Improved Diagnostics to Presurgical Planning: High-Resolution Functionally Graded Multimaterial 3D Printing of Biomedical Tomographic Data Sets , 2018, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing.

[25]  Marcel A. Heinrich,et al.  Rapid Continuous Multimaterial Extrusion Bioprinting , 2017, Advanced materials.

[26]  Mark A. Skylar-Scott,et al.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  De novo composite design based on machine learning algorithm , 2018 .

[28]  J. R. Raney,et al.  Rotational 3D printing of damage-tolerant composites with programmable mechanics , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Jooho Moon,et al.  Influence of fluid physical properties on ink-jet printability. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.