The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams

This study examined a work-adapted version of the Group Environment Questionnaire. The sample consisted of 120 employees of an Australian public sector organization who worked in teams. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine four alternate models. None of the models examined fit the data, thus the scale was revised. Subscales of the work-group characteristics scale were used to demonstrate the construct validity of the revised scale; regional managers’ratings of work-group performance were used to examine the criterion-related validity. The findings showed that task cohesion compared to social cohesion and individual attraction to the group was the strongest correlate of all the variables examined.

[1]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment? , 1998 .

[2]  Claus W. Langfred.  Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword? , 1998 .

[3]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[4]  S. Urbina,et al.  Psychological testing, 7th ed. , 1997 .

[5]  Jamie A. Dyce,et al.  Factorial Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire Among Musicians , 1996 .

[6]  D. Gerbing,et al.  Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[8]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion. , 1995, Journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research , 1995 .

[10]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[11]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[12]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[13]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[14]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[15]  S. Zaccaro.  Nonequivalent Associations Between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality , 1991 .

[16]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[17]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[18]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[19]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[20]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look , 1989 .

[21]  A V Carron,et al.  The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. , 1989, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[22]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. , 1988 .

[23]  James Griffith,et al.  Measurement of Group Cohesion in U. S. Army Units , 1988 .

[24]  Peter Cuttance,et al.  Structural Modeling by Example: Issues and problems in the application of structural equation models , 1988 .

[25]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[26]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach , 1985 .

[27]  A. Carrón,et al.  The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire , 1985 .

[28]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[29]  A. Richardsen,et al.  Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups , 1983 .

[30]  P. Hersey,et al.  Life cycle theory of leadership. , 1979 .

[31]  R. Stogdill.  Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness , 1972 .

[32]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  INTERPERSONAL VALUES, LEADERSHIP ATTITUDES, AND MANAGERIAL “SUCCESS” , 1962 .

[34]  S. Schachter.  Deviation, rejection, and communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[35]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[36]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  Theory and experiment in social communication. , 1950 .

[37]  K. Back.  The exertion of influence through social communication. , 1950 .