Selection of beam angles for radiotherapy of skull base tumours using charged particles.

The geometrical treatment configuration for skull base tumours is investigated using three different sources of information. First, an analysis of treatment angle combinations for 50 patients treated with conventional conformal radiation therapy is performed. In a second step, nine treatment plans for a hypothetical heavy ion gantry were prepared. Finally, cylindrical projections of the organs at risk are introduced as a tool to analyse the distribution of treatment angles as well as the treatment geometry for each patient. The results of the analysis for conventional therapy clearly show treatment angle combinations that are preferably used. These findings are also supported by the geometrical analysis using the cylindrical projections. The majority of treatment angles for heavy ions also seem to be confined to those regions. In one case, however, the sharp distal dose fall-off of the heavy ions allowed a beam direction outside these conventionally used regions. The advantages of a heavy ion gantry versus a fixed horizontal beam line are shown by comparison of treatment plans for both systems. Treatment angle combinations are suggested that should be accessible for any beam line design using either fixed beams or a gantry.

[1]  J. Castro,et al.  Results of heavy ion radiotherapy , 1995, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[2]  M. Scholz,et al.  Calculation of Heavy Ion Inactivation Probabilities Based on Track Structure, X Ray Sensitivity and Target Size , 1994 .

[3]  W Schlegel,et al.  Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  S Minohara,et al.  Relationship between CT number and electron density, scatter angle and nuclear reaction for hadron-therapy treatment planning. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[6]  M Scholz,et al.  Track structure and the calculation of biological effects of heavy charged particles. , 1996, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[7]  M Goitein,et al.  Precise positioning of patients for radiation therapy. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  E Pedroni,et al.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Optimization of beam orientations in radiation therapy: some theoretical considerations. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[12]  E. Pedroni,et al.  A technique for calculating range spectra of charged particle beams distal to thick inhomogeneities. , 1998, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[13]  G T Chen,et al.  Degradation of the Bragg peak due to inhomogeneities. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.