How knowledge flow affects Korean ICT manufacturing firm performance: a focus on open innovation strategy

ABSTRACT The paper presents an integrated viewpoint of technological innovation strategy by considering both the firm and industry levels. Further, we provide a new open innovation framework by adopting a knowledge flow perspective using patent citation information. Finally, we consider a firm’s outbound open innovation performance using cites per patent information together with financial performance to look at both the practical and the potential effects of technological innovation strategy. Through these analyses, this study examines determinants of open technology innovation activity in the information and communication technology manufacturing industry in Korea and draws managerial and policy implications for effective industry promotion and improvement of technology innovation capability.

[1]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[2]  Douglas J. Miller Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance , 2006 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  Performance and strategic changes of SMEs in the Korean electronic parts industry: a dynamic strategic group approach , 2013 .

[6]  Andrea Schenker-Wicki,et al.  The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance , 2011 .

[7]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Wellsprings of Creation: How Perturbation Sustains Exploration in Mature Organizations , 2010 .

[8]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[9]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[10]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[12]  Mary Crossan,et al.  Connecting external knowledge usage and firm performance: An empirical analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Mita Bhattacharya,et al.  Determinants of Innovation , 2004 .

[14]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm , 2011 .

[15]  Myung-Hwan Rim,et al.  Developing and Evaluating New ICT Innovation System: Case Study of Korea's Smart Media Industry , 2015 .

[16]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data: Preface , 1998 .

[17]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .

[18]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities , 2013 .

[19]  Jina Kang,et al.  HOW DO FIRMS SOURCE EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE FOR INNOVATION? ANALYSING EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE SOURCING METHODS , 2009 .

[20]  H. Ernst,et al.  External Technology Commercialization in Large Firms: Results of a Quantitative Benchmarking Study , 2007 .

[21]  Gary R. Oliver,et al.  A micro intellectual capital knowledge flow model: a critical account of IC inside the classroom , 2013 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[23]  Alan Burton-Jones Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy , 1999 .

[24]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Corporate Technology Portfolios and R&D Performance Measures: A Study of Technology Intensive Firms , 2005 .

[25]  S. Roper,et al.  Organizing the Innovation Process: Complementarities in Innovation Networking , 2009 .

[26]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[27]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[28]  George C. Shen,et al.  The effect of inbound open innovation on firm performance: Evidence from high-tech industry , 2015 .

[29]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Strategy and Circumstance: The Response of American Firms to Japanese Competition in Semiconductors, 1980-1995 , 1999 .

[30]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome , 2006 .

[31]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[32]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[33]  CassimanBruno,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy , 2006 .

[34]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Keun Lee,et al.  International, intra-national and inter-firm knowledge diffusion and technological catch-up: the USA, Japan, Korea and Taiwan in the memory chip industry , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[36]  Joel West,et al.  Firms, Users, and Innovation , 2014 .

[37]  Hsin-Yu Shih,et al.  International diffusion of embodied and disembodied technology: A network analysis approach , 2009 .

[38]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[39]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[40]  U. Lichtenthaler OpenInnovation:rentDebates,andFutureDirections , 2011 .

[41]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[42]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[43]  Yaohan Li Borders and Distance in Knowledge Spillovers : Dying over Time or Dying with Age ? Evidence from Patent Citations , 2008 .

[44]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[45]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy , 1996 .

[46]  M. Gittelman,et al.  National institutions, public–private knowledge flows, and innovation performance: A comparative study of the biotechnology industry in the US and France , 2006 .

[47]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: The case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries , 2006 .

[48]  Bhaven N. Sampat,et al.  Patent Citations and the Economic Value of Patents , 2004 .

[49]  Seung-Hyun Kim,et al.  How diversification affects innovation by a Korean mobile content firm , 2012, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[50]  G. Carroll,et al.  The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates , 1983 .

[51]  Hyun-Woo Park,et al.  Scientific and technological knowledge flow and technological innovation: Quantitative approach using patent citation , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[52]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[53]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[54]  Emil Bóasson,et al.  Firm value, spatial knowledge flow, and innovation: evidence from patent citations , 2015 .

[55]  Joel West,et al.  Firms, Users, and Innovation : An Interactive Model of Coupled Open Innovation , 2014 .

[56]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit , 2011 .

[57]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[58]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures , 2005 .

[59]  Zannie Giraud Voss,et al.  Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[61]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[62]  Junseok Hwang,et al.  The Faster-Accelerating Digital Economy , 2014 .

[63]  Krishna B. Kumar,et al.  What Determines Firm Size? , 1999 .

[64]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis , 2011 .

[65]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[66]  Open Innovation in SMEs , 2017 .

[67]  V. Parida,et al.  Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2012 .

[68]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  External knowledge sourcing from innovation cooperation and the role of absorptive capacity: empirical evidence from Norway and Sweden , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[69]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[70]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Firm Size and R&D Intensity: a Re-Examination , 1987 .

[71]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Increasing Returns to Scale in Affluent Knowledge‐Rich Economies , 2001 .

[72]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  On the Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches , 2015 .

[73]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .