The Role of Science in Shaping Sustainable Business: Unilever Case Study

Unilever is a leading example of a multinational company in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector. Unilever has long been an advocate of sustainable business, using scientific assessment as the basis for its strategy and initiatives. Given its business, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is established within the company and there is a current focus on improving the methodology and scope of LCA. Recent developments include new approaches to fill data gaps for agricultural ingredients and new impact assessment methods for assessing land use change. We have also adapted LCA approaches to inform corporate strategy and to engage a broad range of stakeholders both within the company and outside. The most recent and significant example of this has been the use of product footprinting as an integral element of Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan (USLP); currently over 2000 products are footprinted annually across 14 countries.

[1]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[2]  Wayne Daley.  THE UNILEVER SUSTAINABLE LIVING PLAN , 2012 .

[3]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use: role of environmental flow requirements , 2013 .

[4]  Karim Rashid.  I want to change the world , 2001 .

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Anticipating Critical Transitions , 2012, Science.

[6]  John Wilson,et al.  Doing Well by Doing Good: Volunteering and Occupational Achievement among American Women , 2003 .

[7]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Land use impact assessment of margarine , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  R. Clift,et al.  Relationships Between Environmental Impacts and Added Value Along the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[10]  M. Borowitzka.  Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[11]  S. Seitzinger,et al.  Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts , 2013 .

[12]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology , 2008 .

[13]  C. Waddington.  Limits of Growth , 1972, Nature.

[14]  Anthony G. Williams,et al.  Approaches for Addressing Life Cycle Assessment Data Gaps for Bio‐based Products , 2011 .

[15]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[16]  Sarah Sim,et al.  MEXALCA: a modular method for the extrapolation of crop LCA , 2010 .

[17]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[18]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Gert Van Hoof,et al.  Ecotoxicity impact assessment of laundry products: a comparison of USEtox and critical dilution volume approaches , 2011 .

[20]  F. Chapin,et al.  Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity , 2014 .

[21]  L. M. Canals,et al.  Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from the degradation of chemicals in the environment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Water Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment as approaches to assess potential impacts of products on water consumption. Key learning points from pilot studies on tea and margarine , 2012 .

[23]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2007 .

[24]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems , 2014 .

[25]  A. V. Amstel,et al.  The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source , 1996 .

[26]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: Measuring the Natural Capital Requirements of the Human Economy. , 1996 .

[28]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[29]  Richard M. Bailey,et al.  Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled “safe and just space” framework , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Turning back from the brink: Detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early-warning signals for critical transitions , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Ivo Mersiowsky,et al.  LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  Björn Nykvist,et al.  National Environmental Performance on Planetary Boundaries , 2013 .

[34]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Estimating the greenhouse gas footprint of Knorr , 2011 .

[35]  Douglas H. Constance,et al.  Regulating the global fisheries: The World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the Marine Stewardship Council , 2000 .

[36]  B. Walker,et al.  Planetary Boundaries: Ecological Foundations for Corporate Sustainability , 2013 .

[37]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Quantifying global greenhouse gas emissions from land‐use change for crop production , 2012 .

[38]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Estimation of the variability in global warming potential of worldwide crop production using a modular extrapolation approach. , 2012 .

[39]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[40]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[41]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus , 2011 .

[42]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.