VQA-CPC: a novel visual quality assessment metric of color point clouds

Color point clouds can provide users more realistic visual information and better immersive experience than traditional imaging techniques. How to evaluate the visual quality of color point clouds accurately is an important issue to be solved urgently. In this work, we propose a novel full reference metric, called as Visual Quality Assessment of Color Point Clouds (VQA-CPC). Starting from the geometry and texture of color point cloud, the proposed metric calculates the distances from color point cloud’s points to their geometric centroid and the distances from the texture coordinates of the points to texture centroid. Then, a measuring distortion strategy based on distortion measurement is designed and used to extract the features of color point cloud. Finally, the extracted geometric features and texture features are used to construct the feature vector and predict quality of the distorted color point cloud. Moreover, we construct a color point cloud database, called as NBU-PCD1.0, for verifying the effectiveness of the proposed metric. Experimental results show that the proposed VQA-CPC metric is better than the existing point cloud metrics.

[1]  Guillaume Lavoué,et al.  A Multiscale Metric for 3D Mesh Visual Quality Assessment , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment for 3D Triangle Mesh Based on Curvature , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[4]  Soo-Chang Pei,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Using Human Visual DOG Model Fused With Random Forest , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Point Cloud Quality Assessment Metric Based on Angular Similarity , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).

[6]  Ken Chen,et al.  Blind Mesh Quality Assessment Method Based on Concave, Convex and Structural Features Analyses , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW).

[7]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Houqiang Li,et al.  Advanced 3D Motion Prediction for Video-Based Dynamic Point Cloud Compression , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Guillaume Lavoué,et al.  PC-MSDM: A quality metric for 3D point clouds , 2019, 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[10]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[11]  Catarina Brites,et al.  Graph-Based Static 3D Point Clouds Geometry Coding , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[12]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Graph-Based Compression of Dynamic 3D Point Cloud Sequences , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  A novel methodology for quality assessment of voxelized point clouds , 2018, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[15]  Dong Tian,et al.  Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Zhengfang Duanmu,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment of 3d Point Clouds , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[18]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.