Individual wealth typically includes risky assets. Often some of these risks are insurable; but other risks, such as market valuation of stocks, inflation, and other general economic conditions, are usually not insurable. A series of recent papers by Kihlstrom, Romer, and Williams (1981), Ross (1981), Nachman (1982), and Pratt (1982) have shown that the introduction of background risk requires stronger definitions of risk aversion. We will use some of these results to examine the choice of the optimal deductible in an insurance contract when initial wealth is random. An examination of insurance purchases within a broader portfolio is considered by Doherty (1981) and by Mayers and Smith (1983). These papers use a mean-variance framework to examine the separability of the insurance decision. In general, portfolio relationships have nontrivial implications for insurance-buying strategies. In particular, correlation between insurable and noninsurable risk may affect the optimal level of insurance coverage. Deductible insurance is considered mainly because of its widespread use by many insurers. Furthermore, deductibles The literature concerning the choice of optimal deductibles for insurance policies assumes that wealth is nonstochastic except for the value being insured. However, a decision maker's asset portfolio might easily contain other sources of risk, some of which might be uninsurable. This paper examines the choice of a deductible insurance contract in the presence of uninsurable background risk. Existing theorems concerning the optimality of full coverage are shown to hold only under restricted conditions concerning the correlation of insurable risk with other risky assets. More general propositions are established and the effects of risk aversion are considered.
[1]
David Mayers,et al.
The Interdependence of Individual Portfolio Decisions and the Demand for Insurance
,
1983,
Journal of Political Economy.
[2]
David C. Nachman.
Preservation of "more risk averse" under expectations
,
1982
.
[3]
J. P. Gould.
The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Selection of Optimal Deductibles for a Given Insurance Policy
,
1969
.
[4]
Lawrence L. Schkade,et al.
The Selection of an Optimal Deductible for a Given Insurance Policy
,
1966
.
[5]
K. Arrow,et al.
Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing
,
1966
.
[6]
J. Mossin.
Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing
,
1968,
Journal of Political Economy.
[7]
J. Pratt.
RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.
,
1964
.
[8]
Harris Schlesinger,et al.
The Optimal Level of Deductibility in Insurance Contracts
,
1981
.
[9]
S. Ross.
SOME STRONGER MEASURES OF RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND THE LARGE WITH APPLICATIONS
,
1981
.
[10]
R. Kihlstrom,et al.
RISK AVERSION WITH RANDOM INITIAL WEALTH
,
1981
.