Location-Allocation Decisions in Collaborative Networks of Service Enterprises

This paper presents a collaborative mechanism for optimizing the location-allocation decisions associated with networked service enterprises. The decisions are made simultaneously at three levels, of strategic, tactical, and operational. The strategic decisions deal with the optimal location of a set of regional headquarters (RHQ), as service providers, in a set of potential locations, and at a tactical level, the regional subsidiaries (RSS), as service consumers, are allocated to the RHQs. Due to the fact that a portion of services can be provided remotely, the corresponding tasks are divided into physical (p-Task) and electronic (e-Task) tasks. The operational level of decisions then deal with lateral collaboration of RHQs, where RHQs facing capacity shortage share a portion of their e-Tasks with RHQs that have excess capacities, such that (1) the task fulfillment rates, and (2) the resource utilization are maximized. A bi-objective mixed integer programming (BOMIP) is developed for simultaneous optimization of all strategic, tactical, and operational decisions. Numerical experiments indicate significant improvements in the service level (27% on average) and resource utilization (36% on average) made by solving the proposed collaborative location-allocation problem (CLAP), compared to conventional non-collaborative approaches.

[1]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Dynamic Tool Sharing with Best Matching Protocols for Efficient Assembly Line Balancing , 2013 .

[2]  S. S. R. Shariff,et al.  Dynamic conditional location allocation model for healthcare facilities , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research.

[3]  Jason C. H. Chen,et al.  Location and allocation decisions for multi-echelon supply chain network - A multi-objective evolutionary approach , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Shimon Y. Nof Collaborative control theory for e-Work, e-Production, and e-Service , 2007, Annu. Rev. Control..

[5]  A. J. Goldman Optimal Locations for Centers in a Network , 1969 .

[6]  Rafay Ishfaq,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Hub location – allocation in intermodal logistic networks , 2010 .

[7]  Jean-Paul M. Arnaout Ant colony optimization algorithm for the Euclidean location-allocation problem with unknown number of facilities , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[8]  João C. N. Clímaco,et al.  Capacitated single allocation hub location problem - A bi-criteria approach , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Location Awareness Rescue System: Support for Mountain Rescue Teams , 2010, 2010 Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications.

[10]  Jomon Aliyas Paul,et al.  Location-allocation planning of stockpiles for effective disaster mitigation , 2012, Annals of Operations Research.

[11]  Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo,et al.  Single allocation hub location problem under congestion: Network owner and user perspectives , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Combined demand and capacity sharing with best matching decisions in enterprise collaboration , 2014 .

[13]  Loo Hay Lee,et al.  Multi-source facility location-allocation and inventory problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Alfredo Marín,et al.  The discrete facility location problem with balanced allocation of customers , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  M. O'Kelly,et al.  A quadratic integer program for the location of interacting hub facilities , 1987 .

[16]  Albert Rudolph Conrad,et al.  Optimizing interactive performance for long-distance remote observing , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  Young Dae Ko,et al.  Efficient location and allocation strategies for undesirable facilities considering their fundamental properties , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Randi Lunnan,et al.  Moving Abroad: Factors that Motivate Foreign Location of Headquarter Activities , 2011 .