Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.

An impaired reproductive performance in second parity compared to first parity sows, decreases reproductive efficiency and, perhaps, longevity of sows. This study aims to quantify the effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows, i.e. pregnancy rate as well as litter size. Measures of sow development (live weight at first insemination, farrowing and weaning) and reproduction (total number of piglets born, weaning to insemination interval, lactation period, number piglets weaned) were recorded on two experimental farms. Logistic regression analysis was done for the binary outcome 'non-pregnancy from first insemination after first weaning' (yes/no). General linear regression analysis was used for litter size from 1st insemination in second parity. Repeat breeders were omitted from the analysis on litter size in second parity, since a prolonged period between weaning and conception can positively influence litter size. Farms differed significantly in measures of sow live weight development and therefore data were analyzed per farm. Compared with gilts from farm A, gilts from farm B were older and heavier at: first insemination (275±0.9 days and 145±0.8kg for farm B vs. 230±0.6 days and 124±0.5kg for farm A), first farrowing (resp. 189±1.1 vs. 181±0.9kg) and first weaning (resp. 165±1.1 vs. 156±0.9kg). Weight loss during pregnancy was similar for both farms (resp. 24.9±0.7 and 23.7±1.0kg). Gilts from farm A, however, gained more weight in the period between first insemination and first weaning compared with gilts from farm B (resp. 36.1±0.8 and 20.9±1.3kg). Non-pregnancy in second parity was 11% for farm A and 15% for farm B. Litter sizes in first and second parity were, respectively, 10.7±0.1 and 11.6±0.2 for farm A and 11.8±0.1 and 11.6±0.1 for farm B. Variables associated with non-pregnancy and litter size in second parity differed between farms. On farm A, mainly sow live weight development was associated with non-pregnancy and litter size in second parity, whilst on farm B variables like total number born in 1st parity and sow line, were associated with non-pregnancy and litter size in second parity. On both farms, higher weight gain from first insemination to first weaning was associated with a decrease in non-pregnancy (odds ratio 0.7 per 10kg for farm A and 0.8 per 10kg for farm B) and on farm A with higher litter size in second parity (β=0.42 per 10kg weight gain). Results show that sow live weight development affects reproductive performance in second parity, especially on farm A where gilts are relatively light or young at first insemination. Management of these animals should aim to optimize development at first insemination and to increase growth between first insemination and first weaning in order to optimize production in second parity.

[1]  R. Dekker,et al.  Effect of protein supply during pregnancy and lactation on body composition of sows during three reproductive cycles , 1995 .

[2]  H. Everts.  Nitrogen and energy metabolism of sows during several reproductive cycles in relation to nitrogen intake , 1994 .

[3]  N. Williamson,et al.  Improving Parity-Two Litter Size in Swine , 1989 .

[4]  Y. Koketsu,et al.  Longevity, lifetime pig production and productivity, and age at first conception in a cohort of gilts observed over six years on commercial farms. , 1999, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[5]  W. Dixon,et al.  Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development. , 2006, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[6]  J. Noordhuizen.  Application of Quantitative Methods in Veterinary Epidemiology , 2001 .

[7]  O. Vangen,et al.  Genetic analysis of age at first service, return rate, litter size, and weaning-to-first service interval of gilts and sows. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[8]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Impact of different patterns of feed intake during lactation in the primiparous sow on follicular development and oocyte maturation. , 1997, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[9]  B. Kemp,et al.  Productivity and longevity of weaned sows , 2002 .

[10]  Jean-Yves Dourmad,et al.  EFFECT OF AGE AT FIRST FARROWING AND HERD MANAGEMENT ON LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY OF SOWS , 1998 .

[11]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .

[12]  William E. Marsh,et al.  Lifetime reproductive performance in female pigs having distinct reasons for removal , 2000 .

[13]  J. Cosgrove,et al.  Pattern of feed intake and associated metabolic and endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility in primiparous lactating sows. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[14]  H. Quesnel,et al.  Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[15]  J. Wiseman,et al.  Perspectives in Pig Science , 2003 .

[16]  V. Baracos,et al.  Selective protein loss in lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[17]  R. Huirne,et al.  Evaluation of optimal age at first conception in gilts from data collected in commercial swine herds. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[18]  G. Bilkei,et al.  Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. , 2005, Animal reproduction science.

[19]  E. Knol,et al.  Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs , 2001 .

[20]  N. Lundeheim,et al.  Repeat breeding and subsequent reproductive performance in Swedish Landrace and Swedish Yorkshire sows. , 2001, Animal reproduction science.

[21]  P. Vesseur.  Causes and consequences of variation in weaning to oestrus interval in the sow. , 1997 .

[22]  B. Mullan,et al.  Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous sows: I. Voluntary feed intake, weight loss, and plasma metabolites. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[23]  B. Gill.  Nutritional influences on lifetime performance of the sow. , 2000 .

[24]  J. Dourmad,et al.  Protein (lysine) restriction in primiparous lactating sows: effects on metabolic state, somatotropic axis, and reproductive performance after weaning. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[25]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[26]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Effect of delayed breeding on the endocrinology and fecundity of sows. , 1994, Journal of animal science.