Cooperative Multiple-Model Adaptive Guidance for an Aircraft Defending Missile

A cooperative guidance law, for a defender missile protecting an aerial target from an incoming homing missile, is presented. The filter used is a nonlinear adaptation of a multiple model adaptive estimator, in which each model represents a possible guidance law and guidance parameters of the incoming homing missile. Fusion of measurements from both the defender missile and protected aircraft is performed. A matched defender’s missile guidance law is optimized to the identified homing missile guidance law. It utilizes cooperation between the aerial target and the defender missile. The cooperation stems from the fact that the defender knows the future evasive maneuvers to be performed by the protected target and thus can anticipate the maneuvers it will induce on the incoming homing missile. Moreover, the target performs a maneuver that minimizes the control effort requirements from the defender. The estimator and guidance law are combined in a multiple model adaptive control configuration. Simulation results show that combining the estimations with the proposed optimal guidance law, that utilizes cooperation between the defending missile and protected target, yields hit-to-kill closed loop performance with very low control effort. This facilitates the use of relatively small defending missiles to protect aircrafts from homing missiles.

[1]  Josef Shinar,et al.  The effects of non‐linear kinematics in optimal evasion , 1983 .

[2]  J. Shinar,et al.  Three-dimensional optimal pursuit and evasion with bounded controls , 1980 .

[3]  I. Rusnak,et al.  Guidance laws in defense against missile attack , 2008, 2008 IEEE 25th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[4]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Pursuer identification and time-to-go estimation using passive measurements from an evader , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  J. Shinar,et al.  New Results in Optimal Missile Avoidance Analysis , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[6]  Josef Shinar,et al.  Efficient Multiple Model Adaptive Estimation in Ballistic Missile Interception Scenarios , 2002 .

[7]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[8]  Arthur E. Bryson,et al.  Applied Optimal Control , 1969 .

[9]  R. G. Cottrell Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles , 1971 .

[10]  J. Shinar,et al.  OPTIMAL EVASIVE MANEUVERS IN CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY , 1979 .

[11]  Paul M. Julich,et al.  Proportional navigation vs an optimally evading, constant-speed target in two dimensions , 1970 .

[12]  Joseph Z. Ben-Asher,et al.  Advances in Missile Guidance Theory , 1998 .

[13]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[14]  Ernest J. Ohlmeyer Root-mean-square miss distance of proportional navigation missile against sinusoidal target , 1996 .

[15]  Kai Virtanen,et al.  Adaptive controller for the avoidance of an unknownly guided air combat missile , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  V. Garber Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets. , 1968 .

[17]  J. Shinar,et al.  A discrete dynamic game modelling anti-missile defense scenarios , 1995 .

[18]  J. Shinar,et al.  MIXED-STRATEGY GUIDANCE IN FUTURE SHIP DEFENSE , 1996 .

[19]  Rufus Isaacs,et al.  Differential Games , 1965 .

[20]  Josef Shinar,et al.  Using a Multiple-Model Adaptive Estimator in a Random Evasion Missile/Aircraft Encounter , 2001 .

[21]  J. Shinar,et al.  Analysis of Three-Dimensional Optimal Evasion with Linearized Kinematics , 1979 .

[22]  Eugene M. Cliff,et al.  Optimal evasion against a proportionally guided pursuer , 1989 .

[23]  Ilan Rusnak,et al.  Multiple Model-Based Terminal Guidance Law , 2000 .

[24]  Shaul Gutman,et al.  Applied min-max approach to missile guidance and control , 2005 .

[25]  P. Zarchan,et al.  Shaping filters for randomly initiated target maneuvers , 1978 .

[26]  Y. Ho,et al.  Differential games and optimal pursuit-evasion strategies , 1965 .

[27]  Jason Speyer An adaptive terminal guidance scheme based on an exponential cost criterion with application to homing missile guidance , 1975, 1975 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 14th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[28]  R. Asher,et al.  Optimal Guidance with Maneuvering Targets , 1974 .

[29]  D.G. Lainiotis,et al.  Partitioning: A unifying framework for adaptive systems, II: Control , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[30]  J. Shinar,et al.  Analysis of Optimal Evasive Maneuvers Based on a Linearized Two-Dimensional Kinematic Model , 1977 .

[31]  Roger Boyell,et al.  Defending a Moving Target Against Missile or Torpedo Attack , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[32]  J. Shinar Solution Techniques for Realistic Pursuit-Evasion Games , 1981 .

[33]  D. Magill Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes , 1965 .

[34]  Shaul Gutman On Optimal Guidance for Homing Missiles , 1979 .

[35]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Proportional navigation and weaving targets , 1995 .

[36]  Fumiaki Imado,et al.  Fighter evasive maneuvers against proportional navigation missile , 1986 .

[37]  W. R. Wells,et al.  Optimal evasive tactics against a proportional navigation missile with time delay. , 1973 .

[38]  D. Lainiotis,et al.  Recursive algorithm for the calculation of the adaptive Kalman filter weighting coefficients , 1969 .