Which Motoric Condition Is Most Effective for Teaching Spelling to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities?

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of three motoric conditions (writing, tracing, and computer keyboarding) on the spelling performance of 24 third- and fourth-grade students without learning disabilities (NLD) (15 males, 9 females) and 24 third- and fourth-grade students with learning disabilities (LD) (16 males, 8 females). This study applied empirically based procedures for teaching spelling, examined student performance over time, and incorporated student interviews concerning their preference for motoric condition. For number of words spelled and proportion of bi-grams (correct letter sequences) used correctly, significant differences were found between the LD and NLD groups, both at posttest and follow-up, with the NLD students learning to spell more words and apply more correct bi-grams than the students with LD. There was no significant effect for condition for either words spelled or bi-grams, indicating that students did not learn significantly more words in the writing, tracing, or computer condition. There was also a significant time effect indicating that the accuracy of both groups decreased over time from posttest to follow-up for both words and bi-grams. Interviews revealed that students in both groups preferred the computer condition; however, they believed that they learned best in the writing and tracing conditions.

[1]  M. Gettinger,et al.  Effects of Varying Unit Size on Spelling Achievement in Learning Disabled Children , 1981, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning and Behavior Problems , 1988 .

[3]  T. S. Hasselbring,et al.  Consistency of Learning Disabled Students' Spelling Performance , 1986 .

[4]  M. Gettinger,et al.  Designing Spelling Instruction for Learning-Disabled Children: An Emphasis on Unit Size, Distributed Practice, and Training for Transfer , 1982 .

[5]  D. Wechsler.  Manual of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised , 1974 .

[6]  M. Gerber.  Techniques to teach Generalizable Spelling Skills , 1984 .

[7]  S. Graham,et al.  CONDITIONS: EFFECTS ON LD STUDENTS' SPELLING PERFORMANCE , 2007 .

[8]  M. Gerber,et al.  Improving Spelling Performance By Imitating A Child's Errors , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[9]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Research in Learning Disabilities: Issues and Future Directions , 1987 .

[10]  Elizabeth M. Weiss.  Learning Disabled Children's Understanding of Social Interactions of Peers , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quar , 1991 .

[12]  John Elkins,et al.  Characteristics of Children Enrolled in the Child Service Demonstration Centers , 1974 .

[13]  L. Bradley.  The Organisation of Motor Patterns for Spelling: an Effective Remedial Strategy for Backward Readers , 1981, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[14]  J. A. Tucker,et al.  Ethnic Proportions in Classes for the Learning Disabled: Issues in Nonbiased Assessment , 1980 .

[15]  N. Zigmond,et al.  Spelling Instruction in Special Education Classrooms: A Survey of Practices , 1985, Exceptional children.

[16]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Early Spelling Acquisition: Writing Beats the Computer , 1990 .

[17]  Charles Hulme,et al.  An experimental study of multi-sensory teaching with normal and retarded readers , 1984 .

[18]  M. Gerber.  Orthographic Problem-Solving Ability of Learning Disabled and Normally Achieving Students , 1984 .

[19]  Phyllis K. Mirkin,et al.  Valid Measurement Procedures for Continuous Evaluation of Written Expression , 1982 .

[20]  E. Wiig,et al.  Language Assessment and Intervention for the Learning Disabled , 1984 .

[21]  B. Keogh,et al.  Programs for EH and EMR Pupils: Review and Recommendations , 1973 .

[22]  T. Whitlock.  Dyslexia , 1989, The Lancet.

[23]  R. L. Winters,et al.  Visual Persistence and Adult Dyslexia , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[24]  Stanley L. Deno,et al.  Relationships Among Simple Measures of Written Expression and Performance on Standardized Achievement Tests. , 1980 .

[25]  M. Bookman.  Spelling as a Cognitive-Developmental Linguistic Process , 1984 .

[26]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Early Spelling Acquisition: Does Writing Really Beat the Computer? , 1992 .

[27]  Richard Gray,et al.  A Comparison of Components of Written Expression Abilities in Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students at Three Grade Levels , 1980 .

[28]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Imitating Children's Errors to Improve Their Spelling Performance , 1978, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[29]  Lamoine J. Miller,et al.  Spelling Ability of Reading Disabled LD Students and Able Readers , 1982 .

[30]  Marc Wichesky,et al.  The Socially Deficient LD Child in Context , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[31]  Gordon Korstange,et al.  California Achievement Tests , 1988 .

[32]  M. Gerber.  Generalization of Spelling Strategies by LD Students as a Result of Contingent Imitation/Modeling and Mastery Criteria , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Some experimental studies of multi‐sensory teaching: the effects of manual tracing on children's paired‐associate learning , 1987 .

[34]  L. Wilgosh,et al.  Concerns of Families of Children with Learning Disabilities , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[35]  S. Stodolsky,et al.  Student Views About Learning Math and Social Studies , 1991 .

[36]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Reading retardation and multi-sensory teaching , 1981 .