Interpreting weak value amplification with a toy realist model

Constructing an ontology for quantum theory is challenging, in part due to unavoidable measurement back-action. The Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman weak measurement formalism provides a method to predict measurement results (weak values) in a regime where back-action is negligible. The weak value appears analogous to a classical conditional mean and in fact, has a number of features that further suggest it may be interpreted as being related to some underlying ontological model. However, the ontology appears bizarre since the weak values are complex and unbounded. Here, we study weak values in the context of a recent quantum optical experiment involving two-photon interactions. The results of the experiment are reinterpreted within a 'stochastic optics' model of light. The model is based on standard (Maxwell) electromagnetic theory, supplemented by stochastic fluctuations of the electromagnetic fields. We show that the conditional means of the electric field intensities correspond to the experimentally observed weak values. This is a provocative result, as it suggests that at least within this experiment, the weak value gives us information about the average of an ontological quantity (the intensity). We study the breakdown of the stochastic optics model, which occurs outside the experimentally probed regime, and in particular in the limit where the weak value predicts 'anomalous' results.

[1]  E. T. Jaynes,et al.  Survey of the Present Status of Neoclassical Radiation Theory , 1973 .

[2]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Experimental nonlocal and surreal Bohmian trajectories , 2016, Science Advances.

[3]  Matthew F Pusey.  Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Tosi,et al.  Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.

[5]  Aharon Brodutch.  Comment on "How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads". , 2014, Physical review letters.

[6]  L. Vaidman.  Weak-measurement elements of reality , 1996 .

[7]  David J. Starling,et al.  Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[8]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair , 2008, 0811.1625.

[9]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[10]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy's paradox. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[11]  David J. Starling,et al.  Interferometric weak value deflections: Quantum and classical treatments , 2009, 0906.4832.

[12]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[13]  Emilio Santos,et al.  Towards a Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Providing a Model of the Physical World , 2012, 1203.5688.

[14]  R. Glauber.  The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence , 1963 .

[15]  Experimental nonlocal and surreal Bohmian trajectories , 2016, Science Advances.

[16]  Contribution from stochastic electrodynamics to the understanding of quantum mechanics , 2005, quant-ph/0501011.

[17]  Aharon Brodutch,et al.  Nonlocal Measurements via Quantum Erasure. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[18]  L Vaidman,et al.  Weak value controversy , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Weak-value amplification and optimal parameter estimation in the presence of correlated noise , 2017, 1703.01496.

[20]  Weak values beyond weak measurement , 2013, 1310.4193.

[21]  K. A. Kirkpatrick.  Classical three-box 'paradox' , 2002 .

[22]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Weak-value amplification of the nonlinear effect of a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.

[23]  E. Santos,et al.  Stochastic optics: A reaffirmation of the wave nature of light , 1988 .

[24]  M. Hallaji.  Weak Value Amplification of a Post-Selected Single Photon , 2016 .

[25]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  TIME SYMMETRY IN THE QUANTUM PROCESS OF MEASUREMENT , 1964 .

[26]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Measurement and collapse within the two-state vector formalism , 2014, 1406.6382.

[27]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction , 2015 .

[28]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  The three-box paradox revisited , 2006, quant-ph/0606067.

[29]  A. Jordan,et al.  Weak values and the Leggett-Garg inequality in solid-state qubits. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[30]  P. Knight,et al.  Introductory quantum optics , 2004 .

[31]  Leggett.  Comment on "How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-(1/2 particle can turn out to be 100" , 1989, Physical review letters.

[32]  A. Jordan,et al.  Corrigendum: Sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the weak value , 2011, 1106.1871.

[33]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[34]  E. Schrödinger.  Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[36]  A. Matzkin,et al.  Observation of a quantum Cheshire Cat in a matter-wave interferometer experiment , 2013, Nature Communications.

[37]  Stevenson,et al.  The sense in which a "weak measurement" of a spin-(1/2 particle's spin component yields a value 100. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[38]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings , 2016, 1611.03989.

[39]  J. D. Trimmer,et al.  THE PRESENT SITUATION IN QUANTUM MECHANICS: A TRANSLATION OF SCHR6DINGER'S "CAT PARADOX" PAPER , 2014 .

[40]  Vaidman,et al.  Aharonov and Vaidman reply. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[41]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Observation of the nonlinear phase shift due to single post-selected photons , 2015, Nature Physics.

[42]  A. Jordan,et al.  Contextual values of observables in quantum measurements. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[43]  Xing,et al.  A Quantum Light Source for Light-matter Interaction , 2013 .

[44]  Ken B. Wharton,et al.  A New Class of Retrocausal Models , 2018, Entropy.

[45]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Bright filter-free source of indistinguishable photon pairs. , 2008, Optics express.

[46]  H. Wiseman.  Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and bayesianism , 2007, 0706.2522.