Local feedback signals are not distorted by prior eye movements: evidence from visually evoked double saccades.

Recent experiments have shown that the amplitude and direction of saccades evoked by microstimulation of the monkey superior colliculus depend systematically on the amplitude and direction of preceding visually guided saccades as well as on the postsaccade stimulation interval. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that an eye displacement integrator in the local feedback loop of the saccadic burst generator is gradually reset with a time constant of approximately 45 ms. If this is true, similar effects should occur during naturally evoked saccade sequences, causing systematic interval-dependent errors. To test this prediction in humans, saccades toward visual single- and double-step stimuli were elicited, and the properties of the second saccades were investigated as a function of the intersaccadic interval (ISI). In 15-20% of the saccadic responses, ISIs fell well below 100 ms. The errors of the second saccades were not systematically affected by the preceding primary saccade, irrespective of the ISI. Only a slight increase in the endpoint variability of second saccades was observed for the shortest ISIs. These results are at odds with the hypothesis that the putative eye displacement integrator has a reset time constant >10 ms. Instead, it is concluded that the signals involved in the internal feedback control of the saccadic burst generator reflect eye position and/or eye displacement accurately, irrespective of preceding eye movements.

[1]  L E Mays,et al.  Saccades are spatially, not retinocentrically, coded. , 1980, Science.

[2]  D L Robinson,et al.  Modified saccades evoked by stimulation of the macaque superior colliculus account for properties of the resettable integrator. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[4]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Further properties of the human saccadic system: eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points. , 1969, Vision research.

[5]  J. V. Van Gisbergen,et al.  Short-term adaptation of electrically induced saccades in monkey superior colliculus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Scudder A new local feedback model of the saccadic burst generator. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. J. Nichols,et al.  Nonstationary properties of the saccadic system: new constraints on models of saccadic control. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  F. Ottes,et al.  Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  P Dassonville,et al.  Oculomotor localization relies on a damped representation of saccadic eye displacement in human and nonhuman primates , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  Paul Dassonville,et al.  For and Against Spatial Coding of Saccades , 1994 .

[12]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Saccadic eye movements towards stimuli triggered by prior saccades , 1976, Vision Research.

[13]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. II. Reversible activation and deactivation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. J. Nichols,et al.  Component stretching during oblique stimulation-evoked saccades: the role of the superior colliculus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.