Probabilistic approach based optimal placement of phasor measurement units via the estimation of dynamic vulnerability assessment

This paper aims in presenting the optimal placement of the Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) of an IEEE-5 bus system. In this paper a simplest scheme for dynamic vulnerability assessment based on Power System Loss Index has been proposed for Optimal PMU placement and which is compared against the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Techniques namely Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP approach and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. MCDM helps in finding the best solution among the multiple alternatives for the placement of PMU which is based on the weighing factor. But this MCDM has neglected the dynamic operation of the system. In the proposed scheme, the probabilistic nature of network dynamics is performed by Monte Carlo Simulation to iteratively evaluate the system performance for probable input parameter variations such as load variation, generation variation and list of credible contingencies to assess the vulnerability index of the system. Newton - Raphson load flow analysis is performed for each contingency and the power system losses in various parts of the networks are observed. The vulnerability Index is calculated based on total Power System Loss (PSL). Based on the index, the vulnerable regions in the power system network are identified and clustered with the help of Data clustering algorithm. The PMUs have to be located in the most vulnerable regions to prevent the system from blackouts and to take corrective control actions. This proposed simple approach is tested on IEEE-5 Bus test systems. The test result shows that PSL index is effective in identifying the vulnerable regions for optimal PMU placement. The findings of the PMU location are compared against MCDM techniques.

[1]  S. Premrudeepreechacharn,et al.  An Optimal PMU Placement Method Against Measurement Loss and Branch Outage , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  István Erlich,et al.  Probabilistic approach-based PMU placement for real-time power system vulnerability assessment , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[3]  B. Gou,et al.  Generalized Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimal PMU Placement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  S.A. Soman,et al.  Optimal Multistage Scheduling of PMU Placement: An ILP Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  I. Kamwa,et al.  PMU-Based Vulnerability Assessment Using Wide- Area Severity Indices and Tracking Modal Analysis , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[6]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  Vulnerability assessment of a large sized power system considering a new index based on power system loss , 2007 .

[7]  Munish Kumar,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units for Power System Observability , 2015 .

[8]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  New method for vulnerability assessment of power system , 2007 .

[9]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Large Power Systems Into Fuzzy Coherent Areas for Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Ali Mohammad Ranjbar,et al.  Optimal PMU Placement by an Equivalent Linear Formulation for Exhaustive Search , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  S. C. Srivastava,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making approach for multistage optimal placement of phasor measurement units , 2011 .

[12]  H.M. Ismail,et al.  A Unified Approach for the Optimal PMU Location for Power System State Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  E. Kyriakides,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units for Power System Observability , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  S. Gayathri,et al.  Hybrid State Estimation Approach for the Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units , 2013 .

[15]  GHEORGHE GRIGORAS,et al.  Using of Clustering Techniques in Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurements Units , 2009 .

[16]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units Using Immunity Genetic Algorithm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Fuzzy Partitioning of a Real Power System for Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  T Jayabarathi,et al.  State Estimation and Voltage Stability Monitoring Using ILP PMU Placement , 2012 .

[19]  I. Erlich,et al.  Recognition of post-contingency dynamic vulnerability regions: Towards smart grids , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[20]  P. S. Georgilakis,et al.  Optimal placement of phasor measurement units: A literature review , 2011, 2011 16th International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power Systems.