Evaluation and automatic correction of metal-implant-induced artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging

The aim of this paper is to describe a new automatic method for compensation of metal-implant-induced segmentation errors in MR-based attenuation maps (MRMaps) and to evaluate the quantitative influence of those artifacts on the reconstructed PET activity concentration. The developed method uses a PET-based delineation of the patient contour to compensate metal-implant-caused signal voids in the MR scan that is segmented for PET attenuation correction. PET emission data of 13 patients with metal implants examined in a Philips Ingenuity PET/MR were reconstructed with the vendor-provided method for attenuation correction (MRMap(orig), PET(orig)) and additionally with a method for attenuation correction (MRMap(cor), PET(cor)) developed by our group. MRMaps produced by both methods were visually inspected for segmentation errors. The segmentation errors in MRMap(orig) were classified into four classes (L1 and L2 artifacts inside the lung and B1 and B2 artifacts inside the remaining body depending on the assigned attenuation coefficients). The average relative SUV differences (ε(rel)(av)) between PET(orig) and PET(cor) of all regions showing wrong attenuation coefficients in MRMap(orig) were calculated. Additionally, relative SUV(mean) differences (ε(rel)) of tracer accumulations in hot focal structures inside or in the vicinity of these regions were evaluated. MRMap(orig) showed erroneous attenuation coefficients inside the regions affected by metal artifacts and inside the patients' lung in all 13 cases. In MRMap(cor), all regions with metal artifacts, except for the sternum, were filled with the soft-tissue attenuation coefficient and the lung was correctly segmented in all patients. MRMap(cor) only showed small residual segmentation errors in eight patients. ε(rel)(av) (mean ± standard deviation) were: (-56 ± 3)% for B1, (-43 ± 4)% for B2, (21 ± 18)% for L1, (120 ± 47)% for L2 regions. ε(rel) (mean ± standard deviation) of hot focal structures were: (-52 ± 12)% in B1, (-45 ± 13)% in B2, (19 ± 19)% in L1, (51 ± 31)% in L2 regions. Consequently, metal-implant-induced artifacts severely disturb MR-based attenuation correction and SUV quantification in PET/MR. The developed algorithm is able to compensate for these artifacts and improves SUV quantification accuracy distinctly.

[1]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  A. Buck,et al.  Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  PET/MR imaging of the pelvis in the presence of endoprostheses: reducing image artifacts and increasing accuracy through inpainting , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Georg Schramm,et al.  Influence and Compensation of Truncation Artifacts in MR-Based Attenuation Correction in PET/MR , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[8]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[9]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for Improved PET Quantification in Lesions Within Bone and Susceptibility Artifact Regions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  D. Bartlett,et al.  Surface texture measurement for dental wear applications , 2015 .

[13]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography--imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  PET/CT imaging artifacts. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[15]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  F. Hofheinz,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.2) , 1999 .

[19]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET , 2011, Nuklearmedizin.

[23]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data , 2013, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[24]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material. , 2003, Radiology.