Seedling Establishment in Vertical Gradients of Sunlight

Although the amount of solar energy intercepted by a community of herbaceous species may be comparable with that intercepted by forest (Monsi & Saeki 1953), the height of the shaded stratum will certainly differ. In grassland the shaded stratum is low and is usually renewed annually by extension of shoots and individual leaves from positions near the ground. In forests, however, the shaded stratum is high and arises by expansion of foliage in situ. Many seedlings grow out of the shaded stratum of grassland within a few days after germination, while in forests shading persists beyond the seedling phase and may extend over many years. Within low vegetation, small differences in height are associated with large changes in intensity, direction and quality of radiation, and establishment may depend upon height, aspect or inclination of the first leaves produced by the seedling. Because vertical gradients are less pronounced near the forest floor, initial growth in height may be unimportant; here tolerance rather than avoidance of shade would appear to have ecological significance. Hence, radical differences in adaptation to shade may be expected between woodland and grassland plants. To recognize mechanisms by which shade is avoided or tolerated we have examined the reaction of a variety of seedlings to standardized gradients of light intensity.

[1]  J. P. Grime.  Shade Tolerance in Flowering Plants , 1965, Nature.

[2]  J. P. Grime.  Comparative Experiments as a Key to the Ecology of Flowering Plants , 1965 .

[3]  O. Vaartaja.  The Relationship of Fungi to Survival of Shaded Tree Seedlings , 1962 .

[4]  A. R. Clapham,et al.  Flora of the British Isles , 1962 .

[5]  R. M. Wadsworth.  The effect of artificial wind on the growth-rate of plants in water culture. , 1960 .

[6]  P. Wardle.  The Regeneration of Fraxinus Excelsior in Woods with a Field Layer of Mercurialis Perennis , 1959 .

[7]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment XI. A Further Assessment of the Influence of Shading on the Growth of Different Species in the Vegetative Phase , 1959 .

[8]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment , 1959 .

[9]  P. Bourdeau,et al.  Tolerance and Photosynthetic Adaptability to Light Intensity in White Pine, Red Pine, Hemlock and Ailanthus Seedlings , 1958 .

[10]  F. W. Went,et al.  The Experimental Control of Plant Growth , 1958 .

[11]  高井 省三.  Damping-off pathogens of conifers and of caragana in Saskatchwan , 1956 .

[12]  R. Böhning,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LIGHT INTENSITY ON RATE OF APPARENT PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN LEAVES OF SUN AND SHADE PLANTS , 1956 .

[13]  M. Monsi.  Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[14]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment VII. An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Light Intensity on the Net Assimilation Rate, Leaf-Area Ratio, and Relative Growth Rate of Different Species , 1951 .

[15]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant EnvironmentVI. The Constancy for Different Species of a Logarithmic Relationship between Net Assimilation Rate and Light Intensity and its Ecological Significance , 1951 .

[16]  G. E. Blackman,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Studies in the Analysis of Plant Environment: III. The Interaction between Light Intensity and Mineral Nutrient Supply in Leaf Development and in the Net Assimilation Rate of the Bluebell (Scilla non-scripta)1 , 1948 .