What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare’s Sonnets —An Eye Tracking Study

Texts are often reread in everyday life, but most studies of rereading have been based on expository texts, not on literary ones such as poems, though literary texts may be reread more often than others. To correct this bias, the present study is based on two of Shakespeare’s sonnets. Eye movements were recorded, as participants read a sonnet then read it again after a few minutes. After each reading, comprehension and appreciation were measured with the help of a questionnaire. In general, compared to the first reading, rereading improved the fluency of reading (shorter total reading times, shorter regression times, and lower fixation probability) and the depth of comprehension. Contrary to the other rereading studies using literary texts, no increase in appreciation was apparent. Moreover, results from a predictive modeling analysis showed that readers’ eye movements were determined by the same critical psycholinguistic features throughout the two sessions. Apparently, even in the case of poetry, the eye movement control in reading is determined mainly by surface features of the text, unaffected by repetition.

[1]  R. Jakobson,et al.  « Les Chats » de Charles Baudelaire , 1962 .

[2]  W. Hendricks A linguistic guide to English poetry , 1970 .

[3]  B. J. Davidson,et al.  Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: Comment on Just and Carpenters eye fixation theory , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[4]  F. Sun,et al.  Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Jeanne T. Amlund Repetitive Reading and Recall of Expository Text. , 1986 .

[6]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[8]  G. Clements Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .

[9]  M. Masson,et al.  "Rereading text: Words and their context": Erratum. , 1992 .

[10]  B. Levy,et al.  Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. , 1992 .

[11]  P. Dixon,et al.  Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations , 1993 .

[12]  A. Durgunoğlu,et al.  Effects of Repeated Readings on Bilingual and Monolingual Memory for Text , 1993 .

[13]  B. Levy,et al.  Repeated Readings: Process Benefits for Good and Poor Readers , 1993 .

[14]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text , 1995 .

[16]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[17]  Johan Lauwereyns,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in poetry criticism: the expert's eye movements as an information tool , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Effects of Case Marking and Word Order on Sentence Parsing in Finnish: An Eye Fixation Analysis , 1997 .

[19]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[20]  David W. Coit,et al.  STATIC NEURAL NETWORK PROCESS MODELS : CONSIDERATIONS AND CASE STUDIES , 1998 .

[21]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[22]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Repetition Effects From Paraphrased Text: Evidence for an Integrated Representation Model of Text Representation , 2000 .

[23]  K. Millis,et al.  Rereading Strategically: The Influences of Comprehension Ability and a Prior Reading on the Memory for Expository Text. , 2001 .

[24]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  Louise A. Francis Neural Networks Demystified , 2001 .

[26]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Steven Brown Is Rereading more Effective than Prereading? , 2002 .

[28]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  A. Konstantinos,et al.  A Comparative Assessment , 2003 .

[31]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[32]  J. Hakemulder Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers' Perception , 2004 .

[33]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[34]  Brian S. Schnitzer,et al.  Eye movements during multiple readings of the same text , 2006, Vision Research.

[35]  T. Jacobsen Bridging the Arts and Sciences: A Framework for the Psychology of Aesthetics , 2006, Leonardo.

[36]  S. Kinoshita Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye-Movement Control in Reading , 2006 .

[38]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading words and sentences , 2007 .

[39]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[40]  C. Klin,et al.  Repeating phrases across unrelated narratives: Evidence of text repetition effects , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[41]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[42]  N. Maïonchi‐Pino,et al.  Roles of consonant status and sonority in printed syllable processing: Evidence from illusory conjunction and audio-visual recognition tasks in French adults. , 2008 .

[43]  Boris New,et al.  A multiple regression analysis of syntactic and semantic influences in reading normal text , 2008 .

[44]  K. Rayner Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data. , 2009 .

[45]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  G. Tutz,et al.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[47]  A. Kennedy,et al.  On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: The role of nouns, verbs and adjectives , 2009, Vision Research.

[48]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  Clustering Overview and Applications , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[49]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Literature and event understanding , 2011 .

[51]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Gehirn und Gedicht : wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren , 2011 .

[52]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice , 2012, Language Variation and Change.

[53]  J. Saint-Aubin,et al.  The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[54]  I. Berent The phonological mind , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Cross-Validation , 2014 .

[56]  G. Carrol,et al.  Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2* , 2014, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[57]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. , 2014 .

[58]  A. Jacobs Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use: Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading , 2014 .

[59]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[60]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? , 2015, The American psychologist.

[61]  A. Jacobs Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[62]  D. Bui,et al.  A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. , 2015 .

[63]  A. Jacobs The scientific study of literary experience: Sampling the state of the art , 2015 .

[64]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[65]  Measuring literary experience: Comment on Jacobs (2016) , 2015 .

[66]  Francesca M. M. Citron,et al.  The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter – An fMRI study , 2015, Brain and Language.

[67]  E. Reichle,et al.  E-Z Reader , 2015 .

[68]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Style During Literary Reading: Insights from Eye-Tracking , 2016 .

[69]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Caring About Dostoyevsky: The Untapped Potential of Studying Literature , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Cumulative Repetition Effects Across Multiple Readings of a Word: Evidence From Eye Movements , 2016 .

[71]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question , 2016, Frontiers in psychology.

[72]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception: A model-guided, multilevel, multimethod approach , 2016 .

[73]  H. Gruber,et al.  Eye tracking in Educational Science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas. , 2017, Journal of eye movement research.

[74]  A. Jacobs,et al.  “The Brain Is the Prisoner of Thought”: A Machine-Learning Assisted Quantitative Narrative Analysis of Literary Metaphors for Use in Neurocognitive Poetics , 2017 .

[75]  Maria Kraxenberger,et al.  Affinity for Poetry and Aesthetic Appreciation of Joyful and Sad Poems , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[76]  A. Jacobs,et al.  What’s in the brain that ink may character ….: A quantitative narrative analysis of Shakespeare’s 154 sonnets for use in (Neuro-)cognitive poetics , 2017 .

[77]  M. Kuijpers,et al.  Understanding and Appreciating Literary Texts Through Rereading , 2017 .

[78]  H. Müller,et al.  Reading English-Language Haiku: Processes of Meaning Construction Revealed by Eye Movements , 2017 .

[79]  T. Yarkoni,et al.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[80]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[81]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Rhetoric, Neurocognitive Poetics, and the Aesthetics of Adaptation , 2017 .

[82]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics , 2018, Empirical Studies of Literariness.

[83]  A. Jacobs,et al.  What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies , 2018 .

[84]  J. Rodgers,et al.  Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis , 2018, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  Sara J. Margolin,et al.  It May Not Be That Difficult the Second Time Around: The Effects of Rereading on the Comprehension and Metacomprehension of Negated Text. , 2018 .

[86]  Maria Kraxenberger,et al.  Prosody-Based Sound-Emotion Associations in Poetry , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[87]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  The Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus: Exemplary Quantitative Narrative Analyses , 2018, Front. Digit. Humanit..

[88]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Effects of an Active Visuomotor Steering Task on Covert Attention , 2019, Journal of eye movement research.

[89]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[90]  Antal van den Bosch,et al.  Dependency Parsing with your Eyes: Dependency Structure Predicts Eye Regressions During Reading , 2019, Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics.

[91]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling —an Eye Tracking Study , 2019, Journal of eye movement research.

[92]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Following in Jakobson and Lévi-Strauss’ footsteps: A neurocognitive poetics investigation of eye movements during the reading of Baudelaire’s ‘Les Chats’ , 2020, Journal of eye movement research.