Alma mat(t)er(s): Determinants of early career success in economics

We study 6000 author-publication observations to investigate predictors of early career success in six fields of Economics. Concentrating on top researchers enables us to control for the effects of ability and effort, and focusing on the start of their careers minimizes distortions from reputation feedback. Our results reveal that the most important predictor for early career success is the ranking of an author's PhD granting institution, followed by his first placement. Our insights suggest that a counterfactual decrease in the Alma mater of a high ability author, who graduated from a top 10 university, by as little as 10 to 20 ranks, reduces his probability of getting a top 5 publication significantly by 13 percentage points. Lowering the ranking of his Alma mater by another 80 ranks decreases his chances of getting a top publication by a factor of three. Our findings suggest that the Economics publication market values Alma mater signals, discounting newcomers graduating from- or working at lower ranked departments.

[1]  David N. Laband,et al.  Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  D. Laband.  Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors , 1990 .

[3]  Valerie Smeets,et al.  Incentives, Sorting and Productivity Along the Career: Evidence from a Sample of Top Economists , 2005 .

[4]  R. Blundell,et al.  Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models , 1998 .

[5]  Jinyoun Kim,et al.  Incentives for Journal Editors (Motivations des Directeurs de Revues) , 2014 .

[6]  Wendy A. Stock,et al.  The Labor Market for New Ph.D. Economists , 1999 .

[7]  Marshall H. Medoff,et al.  Editorial Favoritism in Economics , 2003 .

[8]  Joseph Engelberg,et al.  Networks and Productivity: Causal Evidence from Editor Rotations , 2012 .

[9]  John P. Conley,et al.  The Effects of Publication Lags on Life‐Cycle Research Productivity in Economics , 2011 .

[10]  John P. Conley,et al.  The Research Productivity of New PhDs in Economics: The Surprisingly High Non-success of the Successful , 2014 .

[11]  Marko Terviö,et al.  Is Economics a House Divided? Analysis of Citation Networks , 2015 .

[12]  D. Hamermesh.  Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How? , 2012 .

[13]  D. Laband,et al.  A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  Oscar Volij,et al.  The Measurement of Intellectual Influence , 2002 .

[15]  T. Coupé,et al.  Does the Academic Labor Market Initially Allocate New Graduates Efficiently , 2006 .

[16]  D. Colander.  Vision, judgment, and disagreement among economists , 1994 .

[17]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly? , 1999 .

[18]  Paul Oyer,et al.  Initial Labor Market Conditions and Long-Term Outcomes for Economists , 2006 .

[19]  Christian Zimmermann,et al.  Academic Rankings with RePEc , 2012 .

[20]  Ivo Welch,et al.  Referee Recommendations , 2013 .

[21]  Pantelis Kalaitzidakis,et al.  RANKINGS OF ACADEMIC JOURNALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN ECONOMICS , 2003 .