History of Low-Order Equivalent Systems for Aircraft Flying Qualities

Introduction F ROM the beginnings of the evolution of flight, there evolved an appreciation of the advantages of an aircraft that was easy for the pilot to fly. Among the insights for which they are famous is the Wright brothers’ realization that when the ability to balance and steer became understood, then aviation would truly have arrived. As the balance between stability and control became better understood, aircraft emerged with sufficiently good flying (or handling) qualities to allow air-to-air combat, reliable passenger transport, and a host of other uses. As aeronautical engineers examined the measurable factors that seemed to bestow good flying qualities, they followed the urge of all engineers, which is to write down those lessons, rules of thumb, and guidelines that make the job easier the next time. From the observations of these engineers, and especially from dedicated research using special-purpose variable-stability aircraft, the community began to document characteristics that were preferred for good flying qualities, along with characteristics that would indicate poor qualities. Most of the early flying-qualities work involved essentially steady-state characteristics like stick force variation with steady, trimmed speed. Dynamic behavior was not so well understood, though early aviators did comprehend the slow tradeoff between altitude and speed in Lanchester’s phugoid mode. They also knew all too well the sinister origins of the slow divergence called the spiral mode. The quick lateral-directional oscillations of the Dutch roll were commonly experienced. Appreciation of the rigidbody modes of motion greatly improved in the first half of the 20th century, including the faster lateral roll mode and the quick angle-of-attack oscillations of the short-period mode. By the middle of the 20th century, engineers realized that the time constants, damping ratios, and natural frequencies of all of these modes could be correlated with flying qualities, good or bad. The stage was set for formal requirements, in the form of military specifications, to define the good and bad values of these modal parameters.

[1]  John Hodgkinson,et al.  V/STOL Equivalent Systems Analysis. , 1980 .

[2]  Eric Potsdam,et al.  An analysis of feel system effects on lateral flying qualities , 1990 .

[3]  A Morelli Eugene,et al.  Low Order Equivalent System Identification for the Tu-144LL Supersonic Transport Aircraft , 2000 .

[4]  Robert C. Ettinger,et al.  Relationships between flying qualities, transient agility, and operational effectiveness of fighter aircraft , 1988 .

[5]  Randall Bailey,et al.  Initial results of an in-flight investigation of longitudinal flyingqualities for augmented, large transports in approach and landing , 1993 .

[6]  Rogers E Smith Effects of Control System Dynamics on Fighter Approach and Landing Longitudinal Flying Qualities. (Volume I). , 1978 .

[7]  A Morelli Eugene Identification of Low Order Equivalent System Models From Flight Test Data , 2000 .

[8]  J. Hodgkinson,et al.  The Use and Effectiveness of Piloted Simulation in Transport Aircraft Research and Development , 1992 .

[9]  David J. Moorhouse,et al.  The control system design methodology of the STOL and Manoeuvre Technology Demonstrator , 1994 .

[10]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Interaction of feel system and flight control system dynamics on lateral flying qualities , 1988 .

[11]  M. Marchand,et al.  EFA Flying Qualities Specification and its Utilisation. , 1993 .

[12]  D. E. Bischoff,et al.  Development of Lateral-Directional Equivalent System Models for Selected U.S. Navy Tactical Aircraft. , 1983 .

[13]  Di Franco,et al.  IN-FLIGHT INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF HIGHER-ORDER CONTROL SYSTEM DYNAMICS ON LONGITUDINAL HANDLING QUALITIES , 1968 .

[14]  J. M. Stifel A Time Response Approach to Equivalent Aircraft Dynamics , 1979 .

[15]  J. Hodgkinson,et al.  Initial results of an inflight simulation of augmented dynamics in fighter approach and landing , 1979 .

[16]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Low order equivalent system identification for the Tu-144LL supersonic transport aircraft , 2000 .

[17]  Wim de Boer,et al.  Flight Control Design - Best Practices , 2000 .

[18]  Jay M. Brandon,et al.  Ground-to-Flight Handling Qualities Comparisons for a High Performance Airplane , 1995 .

[19]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Low-Order Approaches to High-Order Systems: Problems and Promises , 1982 .

[20]  William S. Levine,et al.  CONDUIT: A New Multidisciplinary Integration Environment for Flight Control Development , 1997 .

[21]  David E Bischoff Development of Longitudinal Equivalent System Models for Selected U.S. Navy Tactical Aircraft , 1981 .

[22]  Roger H. Hoh,et al.  Development of Handling Quality Criteria for Aircraft with Independent Control of Six Degrees of Freedom , 1981 .

[23]  Rogers E. Smith,et al.  An In-Flight Investigation to Develop Control System Design Criteria for Fighter Airplanes. Volume 1 , 1970 .

[24]  S. K. Sarrafian,et al.  Effect of time delay on flying qualities - An update , 1986 .

[25]  M. F. Shafer Low order equivalent models of highly augmented aircraft determined from flight data using maximum likelihood estimation , 1980 .

[26]  Samuel J. Craig,et al.  An Analysis of Navy Approach Power Compensator Problems and Requirements. , 1971 .

[27]  R. J. Wilson,et al.  In-Flight Evaluation of Control System Pure Time Delays , 1982 .

[28]  D E Bischoff The Control Anticipation Parameter for Augmented Aircraft. , 1981 .

[30]  John Hodgkinson,et al.  Aircraft Handling Qualities , 1999 .

[31]  J. Hodgkinson,et al.  Interpreting the handling qualities of aircraft with stability and control augmentation , 1990 .

[32]  J. Hodgkinson,et al.  Equivalent system approaches to handling qualities analysis and design problems of augmented aircraft , 1977 .

[33]  R. C. Radford,et al.  Landing flying qualities evaluation criteria for augmented aircraft , 1980 .

[34]  J. Hodgkinson,et al.  Handling qualities of aircraft with stabilty and control augmentation systems—a fundamental approach , 1976, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[35]  R. Hoh,et al.  An alternate method of specifying bandwidth for flying qualities , 1982 .

[36]  John Hodgkinson,et al.  Longitudinal and lateral-directional flying qualities investigation of high-order characteristics for advanced-technology transports , 1993 .

[37]  T. Gentry Guidance for the use of equivalent systems with MIL-F-8785C , 1982 .

[38]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Determining bandwidth in the presence of nonlinearities , 1999 .

[39]  Charles R. Chalk,et al.  Background Information and User Guide for Mil-F-8785B (ASG), 'Military Specification-Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes' , 1969 .

[40]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Proposed MIL Standard and Handbook - Flying Qualities of Air Vehicles. Volume 2. Proposed MIL Handbook , 1982 .