Upright MRI measurement of mechanical axis and frontal plane alignment as a new technique: a comparative study with weight bearing full length radiographs

ObjectiveThe purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the practicality, accuracy, and reliability of upright MR imaging as a new radiation-free technique for the measurement of mechanical axis.MethodsWe used upright MRI in 15 consecutive patients (30 limbs, 44.7 ± 20.6 years old) to measure mechanical axis deviation (MAD), hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, leg length, and all remaining angles of the frontal plane alignment according to Paley (mLPFA, mLDTA, mMPTA, mLDTA, JLCA). The measurements were compared to weight bearing full length radiographs, which are considered to be the standard of reference for planning corrective surgery. FDA-approved medical planning software (MediCAD) was used for the above measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility using mean absolute differences was also calculated for both methods.ResultsThe correlation coefficient between angles determined with upright MRI and weight bearing full length radiographs was high for mLPFA, mLDTA, mMPTA, mLDTA, and the HKA angle (r > 0.70). Mean interobserver and intraobserver agreements for upright MRI were also very high (r > 0.89). The leg length and the MAD were significantly underestimated by MRI (-3.2 ± 2.2 cm, p < 0.001 and -6.2 ± 4.4 mm, p = 0.006, respectively).ConclusionsWith the exception of underestimation of leg length and MAD, upright MR imaging measurements of the frontal plane angles are precise and produce reliable, reproducible results.

[1]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  The whole leg radiographStanding versus supine for determining axial alignment , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  P. Lotke,et al.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  J. Wright Heterotopic ossification about the hip after intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femur. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  L. Sharma,et al.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  Heiko Graichen,et al.  An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities—reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application , 2008, European Radiology.

[7]  D. Paley,et al.  [Principles of deformity correction around the knee]. , 2000, Der Orthopade.

[8]  B. Wall,et al.  Doses to Patients from Medical X-ray Examinations in the UK - 2000 Review , 1996 .

[9]  P Keppler,et al.  [Sonographic imaging of leg geometry]. , 1999, Der Orthopade.

[10]  Femoral Anteversion Measured by Ultrasonography and Radiography , 1988 .

[11]  L. Claes,et al.  Determination of leg geometry by ultrasound , 1999, Der Orthopäde.

[12]  T. Terjesen,et al.  Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasonography and radiography. An anatomic investigation. , 1988, Acta radiologica.

[13]  A. Bhave,et al.  Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. , 1994, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[14]  P Benum,et al.  Leg-length discrepancy measured by ultrasonography. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  F. Noyes,et al.  Human Meniscus Allografts’ in Vivo Size and Motion Characteristics , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  M Richter,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intraobserver reliability compared to conventional method , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  C. Krettek,et al.  Insufficient Bone Regenerate after Intramedullary Femoral Lengthening: Risk Factors and Classification System , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  A. Rieber,et al.  MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  C. Krettek,et al.  The role of preoperative MRI in knee arthroscopy: a retrospective analysis of 2,000 patients , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  M. Brinker,et al.  Bone Realignment with Use of Temporary External Fixation for Distal Femoral Valgus and Varus Deformities , 2003, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[22]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Comparison of conventional standing knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing progression of tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[24]  E Y Chao,et al.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.