Non-invasive determination of pressure recovery by cardiac MRI and echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: short and long-term outcome prediction
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Beer | V. Rasche | F. Weidemann | F. Sagmeister | A. Liebold | H. Brunner | P. Bernhardt | S. Herrmann | T. Gassenmaier
[1] M. Takeuchi,et al. Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Coefficient for Predicting Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Outcomes: Direct Comparison With Aortic Valve Area , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[2] M. Markl,et al. The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[3] C. Tribouilloy,et al. Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon. , 2018, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.
[4] R. Bauernschmitt,et al. Extent of size, shape and systolic variability of the left ventricular outflow tract in aortic stenosis determined by phase-contrast MRI. , 2018, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[5] B. Gerber,et al. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[6] R. Rubinshtein,et al. The effect of aortic area measurement site on the energy loss coefficient: a comparison between echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients with aortic stenosis , 2016, Echocardiography.
[7] Hojin Ha,et al. Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy using 4D phase-contrast MRI: Effect of scan parameters and target vessel size. , 2016, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[8] G. Kim,et al. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Measurement Using Phase Contrast MRI for Estimating the Post-Stenotic Pressure Drop: In Vitro Validation and Clinical Application , 2016, PloS one.
[9] W. Rottbauer,et al. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is equal to contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography for correct aortic sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2016, Clinical Research in Cardiology.
[10] T. Lüscher,et al. Impact of Three‐Dimensional Imaging and Pressure Recovery on Echocardiographic Evaluation of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Pilot Study , 2014, Echocardiography.
[11] Y. Neishi,et al. Impact of energy loss index on left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement , 2013, Journal of Echocardiography.
[12] J. Chambers,et al. Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Index in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis , 2013, Circulation.
[13] E. Tseng,et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[14] M. Worthley,et al. Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[15] D. Capodanno,et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[16] K. Kuck,et al. Aortic root geometry in aortic stenosis patients (a SEAS substudy). , 2011, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.
[17] P. Parizel,et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] K. Kuck,et al. Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[19] Jennifer Keegan,et al. Aortic Root Measurement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Specification of Planes and Lines of Measurement and Corresponding Normal Values , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[20] Guang-Zhong Yang,et al. Motion-compensated MR valve imaging with COMB tag tracking and super-resolution enhancement , 2007, Medical Image Anal..
[21] Guang-Zhong Yang,et al. Motion-Compensated MR Valve Imaging with COMB Tag Tracking and Super-Resolution Enhancement , 2006, MICCAI.
[22] Gideon Sahar,et al. Comparison of diameter of ascending aorta in patients with severe aortic stenosis secondary to congenital versus degenerative versus rheumatic etiologies. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[23] Damien Garcia,et al. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[24] M. Chandra,et al. Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[25] P. Pibarot,et al. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. , 2000, Circulation.
[26] K. Karsch,et al. Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. , 1999, European heart journal.
[27] G Maurer,et al. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] J. Chambers. Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation? , 1996, Heart.
[29] C. Clark,et al. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.
[30] C Clark,et al. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis - II. Unsteady flow experiments. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.