Ruggedness in the folding landscape of protein L

By exploring the folding pathways of the B1 domain of protein L with a series of equilibrium and rapid kinetic experiments, we have found its unfolded state to be more complex than suggested by two‐state folding models. Using an ultrarapid mixer to initiate protein folding within ∼2–4 microseconds, we observe folding kinetics by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We detect at least two processes faster than 100 μs that would be hidden within the burst phase of a stopped‐flow instrument measuring tryptophan fluorescence. Previously reported measurements of slow intramolecular diffusion are commensurate with the slower of the two observed fast phases. These results suggest that a multidimensional energy landscape is necessary to describe the folding of protein L, and that the dynamics of the unfolded state is dominated by multiple small energy barriers.

[1]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Kinetics are probe-dependent during downhill folding of an engineered lambda6-85 protein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D Baker,et al.  Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[3]  D Baker,et al.  Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[4]  M. Gruebele.  Protein folding: the free energy surface. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Shuhuai Yao,et al.  Improvements in mixing time and mixing uniformity in devices designed for studies of protein folding kinetics. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  H. Roder,et al.  Early kinetic intermediate in the folding of acyl-CoA binding protein detected by fluorescence labeling and ultrarapid mixing , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D J Bicout,et al.  Entropic barriers, transition states, funnels, and exponential protein folding kinetics: A simple model , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  Lisa J. Lapidus,et al.  Fast kinetics and mechanisms in protein folding. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[9]  Benjamin Schuler,et al.  Ultrafast dynamics of protein collapse from single-molecule photon statistics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  B. Valeur,et al.  Mathematical functions for the analysis of luminescence decays with underlying distributions 1. Kohlrausch decay function (stretched exponential) , 2005 .

[11]  Electronic energy transfer in polymers labeled at both ends with fluorescent groups , 2002 .

[12]  Qian Yi,et al.  Direct evidence for a two‐state protein unfolding transition from hydrogen‐deuterium exchange, mass spectrometry, and NMR , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Detection-dependent kinetics as a probe of folding landscape microstructure. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  W. Wedemeyer,et al.  Dynamic similarity of the unfolded states of proteins L and G. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[15]  Lisa J Lapidus,et al.  How fast is protein hydrophobic collapse? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[17]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Folding at the speed limit , 2003, Nature.

[18]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Smaller and faster: the 20-residue Trp-cage protein folds in 4 micros. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  E. Haas,et al.  A general strategy for site-specific double labeling of globular proteins for kinetic FRET studies. , 2002, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[20]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Dynamics of Intramolecular Contact Formation in Polypeptides , 2001 .

[21]  R. Zwanzig,et al.  Diffusion in a rough potential. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Athi N. Naganathan,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: barrier effects in chemical and thermal denaturation experiments. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Dynamics of intramolecular contact formation in polypeptides: distance dependence of quenching rates in a room-temperature glass. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[25]  Lisa J. Lapidus,et al.  Protein hydrophobic collapse and early folding steps observed in a microfluidic mixer. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Soon-Ho Park,et al.  Folding dynamics of the B1 domain of protein G explored by ultrarapid mixing , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  Sheena E. Radford,et al.  Ultrarapid mixing experiments reveal that Im7 folds via an on-pathway intermediate , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  Chain collapse can occur concomitantly with the rate-limiting step in protein folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  Michelle L. Scalley,et al.  Characterization of the free energy spectrum of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Folding & design.

[30]  H. Roder,et al.  Evidence for barrier-limited protein folding kinetics on the microsecond time scale , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  Lisa J. Lapidus,et al.  Effects of denaturants on the dynamics of loop formation in polypeptides. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Bijan Mohammadi,et al.  Optimization of a microfluidic mixer for studying protein folding kinetics. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Kinetics are probe-dependent during downhill folding of an engineered λ6–85 protein , 2005 .

[34]  M. Fayer,et al.  Electronic excitation transport on isolated, flexible polymer chains in the amorphous solid state randomly tagged or end tagged with chromophores , 1986 .

[35]  E. Henry,et al.  Relaxation rate for an ultrafast folding protein is independent of chemical denaturant concentration. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Experimental tests of villin subdomain folding simulations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Austin,et al.  Hydrodynamic Focusing on a Silicon Chip: Mixing Nanoliters in Microseconds , 1998 .

[38]  D Baker,et al.  Protein folding kinetics exhibit an Arrhenius temperature dependence when corrected for the temperature dependence of protein stability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Shimon Weiss,et al.  Protein–protein interactions as a tool for site‐specific labeling of proteins , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  Shimon Weiss,et al.  Femtomole mixer for microsecond kinetic studies of protein folding. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  Barrierless evolution of structure during the submillisecond refolding reaction of a small protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.