Agreements between firms and the technological life cycle model: Evidence from information technologies

Abstract Contrarily to most previous contributions which have addressed the issue of cooperative agreements essentially in a perspective of comparative statics, in this paper a model is proposed that relies on the technological trajectory notion suggested by evolutionary theories and emphasizes the relevance of the technological and market dynamics in explaining why and to what extent firms have recourse to agreements. In particular, it is claimed that the propensity of firms towards collaborative ventures and the characteristics of the cooperation depend upon the phase of the technological life cycle of the industry branch in which the cooperation takes place. Based on a cross-sectional analysis of 45 industry branches in the Information Technology industrial system, the paper also provides empirical evidence supporting the argument that the propensity towards agreements and the nature of the agreements concluded do change during the technological life cycle. To this end, it takes advantage of the ARPA database, developed at the Polytechnic of Milan and containing detailed information on over 2,000 agreements concluded in the 1980–1986 period all over the world in the semiconductor, data processing and telecommunications industries.

[1]  J. Metcalfe.  Impulse and diffusion in the study of technical change , 1981 .

[2]  G. Richardson,et al.  The Organisation of Industry , 1972 .

[3]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[4]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Quantifying the competitive effects of production joint ventures , 1986 .

[5]  M. Porter.  The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[6]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[7]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  U.S. technological leadership: Where did it come from and where did it go? , 1990 .

[8]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[9]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[10]  Almarin Phillips,et al.  A Theory of Interfirm Organization , 1960 .

[11]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[12]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[13]  Competition europeenne et cooperation entre entreprises en matiere de recherche-developpement = Competition and cooperation between European companies in terms of research and development , 1986 .

[14]  O. Williamson.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[15]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The competitive effects of partial equity interests and joint ventures , 1986 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[17]  Karen J. Hladik.  International joint ventures: An economic analysis of U.S.-foreign business partnerships , 1985 .

[18]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[19]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[20]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Organization of Industry , 1969 .

[21]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[22]  K. Blois,et al.  Vertical Quasi-Integration , 1972 .

[23]  D. Flath.  Vertical integration by means of shareholding interlocks , 1989 .