Identification of Patient-Specific Parameters in a Kinetic Model of Fluid and Mass Transfer During Dialysis

Hemodialysis (HD) is nowadays the most common therapy to treat renal insufficiency. However, despite the improvements made in the last years, HD is still associated with a non-negligible rate of co-morbidities, which could be reduced by means of an appropriate treatment customization. Many differential multi-compartment models have been developed to describe solute kinetics during HD, to optimize treatments, and to prevent intra-dialysis complications; however, they often refer to an average uremic patient. On the contrary, the clinical need for customization requires patient-specific models. In this work, assuming that the customization can be obtained by means of patient-specific model parameters, we propose a Bayesian approach to estimate the patient-specific parameters of a multi-compartment model and to predict the single patient’s response to the treatment, in order to prevent intra-dialysis complications. The likelihood function is obtained through a discretized version of a multi-compartment model, where the discretization is in terms of a Runge–Kutta method to guarantee the convergence, and the posterior densities of model parameters are obtained through Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation.

[1]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Dialysis hypotension: a hemodynamic analysis. , 1991, Kidney international.

[2]  A. Cheung,et al.  Prescribing hemodialysis using a weekly urea mass balance model. , 1991, Blood purification.

[3]  F. Locatelli,et al.  Optimization of sodium removal in paired filtration dialysis by single pool sodium and conductivity kinetic models. , 1997, Blood purification.

[4]  W. Clark,et al.  Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  F. Locatelli,et al.  The role of blood volume reduction in the genesis of intradialytic hypotension. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[6]  S. Prakash,et al.  Central, Peripheral, and Other Blood Volume Changes During Hemodialysis , 2002, ASAIO journal.

[7]  A. Peixoto,et al.  Methods of Assessment of Volume Status and Intercompartmental Fluid Shifts in Hemodialysis Patients: Implications in Clinical Practice , 2004, Seminars in dialysis.

[8]  M. Ursino,et al.  Prediction of Solute Kinetics, Acid-Base Status, and Blood Volume Changes During Profiled Hemodialysis , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge,et al.  Relative blood volume changes underestimate total blood volume changes during hemodialysis. , 2007, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[10]  W. Henrich,et al.  Recent advances in the prevention and management of intradialytic hypotension. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[11]  S. Santos,et al.  Sodium Balance in Maintenance Hemodialysis , 2010, Seminars in dialysis.

[12]  Fabrizio Ruggeri,et al.  Inertance estimation in a lumped-parameter hydraulic simulator of human circulation. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  F. Ruggeri,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Thermal Conductivity and Temperature Profile in a Homogeneous Mass , 2014 .

[14]  M. Tapolyai,et al.  Which fluid space is affected by ultrafiltration during hemodiafiltration? , 2014, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[15]  Michele Conti,et al.  A Clinically Applicable Stochastic Approach for Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Using Computed Tomography Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Domenico Vito,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Multicompartmental Fluid and Mass Exchange during Dialysis , 2016, The International journal of artificial organs.

[17]  Ettore Lanzarone,et al.  A Bayesian estimation approach for the mortality in a stage-structured demographic model , 2017, Journal of mathematical biology.