Efficient Bayesian inversion for shape reconstruction of lithography masks
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sebastian Heidenreich | Bernd Bodermann | Markus Bär | Philipp-Immanuel Schneider | Martin Hammerschmidt | Nando Farchmin | Matthias Wurm | M. Bär | M. Hammerschmidt | S. Heidenreich | B. Bodermann | M. Wurm | Philipp‐Immanuel Schneider | N. Farchmin
[1] Wolfgang Osten,et al. Solving the inverse grating problem by white light interference Fourier scatterometry , 2012, Light: Science & Applications.
[2] Gaoliang Dai,et al. Scatterometry reference standards to improve tool matching and traceability in lithographical nanomanufacturing , 2015, SPIE NanoScience + Engineering.
[3] Sérgio Pereira,et al. Performance analysis of coherent optical scatterometry , 2011 .
[4] Paola Annoni,et al. Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .
[5] N. Cutland,et al. On homogeneous chaos , 1991, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[6] Gaoliang Dai,et al. Comparison of CD measurements of an EUV photomask by EUV scatterometry and CD-AFM , 2013, Photomask Technology.
[7] D. Rubin,et al. Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .
[8] R. M. Silver,et al. Optimizing hybrid metrology through a consistent multi-tool parameter set and uncertainty model , 2014, Advanced Lithography.
[9] Heather Patrick,et al. Developing an uncertainty analysis for optical scatterometry , 2009, Advanced Lithography.
[10] Hermann Gross,et al. The statistical inverse problem of scatterometry: Bayesian inference and the effect of different priors , 2015, Optical Metrology.
[11] Ilya M. Sobol,et al. Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .
[12] D. Xiu. Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review , 2009 .
[13] Bernd Bodermann,et al. Quantifying parameter uncertainties in optical scatterometry using Bayesian inversion , 2017, Optical Metrology.
[14] Bruno Sudret,et al. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[15] Clemens Elster,et al. Improved reconstruction of critical dimensions in extreme ultraviolet scatterometry by modeling systematic errors , 2014 .
[16] A. Cohen,et al. Optimal weighted least-squares methods , 2016, 1608.00512.
[17] C. Mack. Fundamental principles of optical lithography : the science of microfabrication , 2007 .
[18] Frank Scholze,et al. Applicability of the Debye-Waller damping factor for the determination of the line-edge roughness of lamellar gratings. , 2019, Optics express.
[19] Jan Richter,et al. Deep ultraviolet scatterometer for dimensional characterization of nanostructures: system improvements and test measurements , 2011 .
[20] B. M. Barnes,et al. A Bayesian statistical model for hybrid metrology to improve measurement accuracy , 2011, Optical Metrology.
[21] Frank Schmidt,et al. Adaptive finite element method for simulation of optical nano structures , 2007, 0711.2149.
[22] Sebastian Heidenreich,et al. Efficient global sensitivity analysis for silicon line gratings using polynomial chaos , 2019, Optical Metrology.
[23] W. T. Martin,et al. The Orthogonal Development of Non-Linear Functionals in Series of Fourier-Hermite Functionals , 1947 .
[24] R. Ghanem,et al. Polynomial Chaos in Stochastic Finite Elements , 1990 .
[25] Peter Monk,et al. Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations , 2003 .
[26] Paola Annoni,et al. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[27] Bernd Bodermann,et al. Metrology of nanoscale grating structures by UV scatterometry. , 2017, Optics express.
[28] L. Zschiedrich. Transparent boundary conditions for Maxwell's equations: Numerical concepts beyond the PML method , 2009 .
[29] Poul-Erik Hansen,et al. Imaging scatterometry for flexible measurements of patterned areas. , 2016, Optics express.
[30] Hermann Gross,et al. BAYESIAN APPROACH TO THE STATISTICAL INVERSE PROBLEM OF SCATTEROMETRY: COMPARISON OF THREE SURROGATE MODELS , 2015 .
[31] John R. McNeil,et al. Metrology of subwavelength photoresist gratings using optical scatterometry , 1995 .
[32] A. Saltelli,et al. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .
[33] Clemens Elster,et al. A surrogate model enables a Bayesian approach to the inverse problem of scatterometry , 2014 .
[34] I. Sobola,et al. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .
[35] Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .
[36] Hermann Gross,et al. Bayesian approach to determine critical dimensions from scatterometric measurements , 2018, Metrologia.
[37] Hsu-ting Huang,et al. Spectroscopic ellipsometry and reflectometry from gratings (Scatterometry) for critical dimension measurement and in situ, real-time process monitoring , 2004 .
[38] M. Badaroglu,et al. Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices , 2018, Nature Electronics.
[39] Clemens Elster,et al. A maximum likelihood approach to the inverse problem of scatterometry. , 2012, Optics express.