Efficient Bayesian inversion for shape reconstruction of lithography masks

Abstract. Background: Scatterometry is a fast, indirect, and nondestructive optical method for quality control in the production of lithography masks. To solve the inverse problem in compliance with the upcoming need for improved accuracy, a computationally expensive forward model that maps geometry parameters to diffracted light intensities has to be defined. Aim: To quantify the uncertainties in the reconstruction of the geometry parameters, a fast-to-evaluate surrogate for the forward model has to be introduced. Approach: We use a nonintrusive polynomial chaos-based approximation of the forward model, which increases speed and thus enables the exploration of the posterior through direct Bayesian inference. In addition, this surrogate allows for a global sensitivity analysis at no additional computational overhead. Results: This approach yields information about the complete distribution of the geometry parameters of a silicon line grating, which in return allows for quantifying the reconstruction uncertainties in the form of means, variances, and higher order moments of the parameters. Conclusions: The use of a polynomial chaos surrogate allows for quantifying both parameter influences and reconstruction uncertainties. This approach is easy to use since no adaptation of the expensive forward model is required.

[1]  Wolfgang Osten,et al.  Solving the inverse grating problem by white light interference Fourier scatterometry , 2012, Light: Science & Applications.

[2]  Gaoliang Dai,et al.  Scatterometry reference standards to improve tool matching and traceability in lithographical nanomanufacturing , 2015, SPIE NanoScience + Engineering.

[3]  Sérgio Pereira,et al.  Performance analysis of coherent optical scatterometry , 2011 .

[4]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[5]  N. Cutland,et al.  On homogeneous chaos , 1991, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  Gaoliang Dai,et al.  Comparison of CD measurements of an EUV photomask by EUV scatterometry and CD-AFM , 2013, Photomask Technology.

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[8]  R. M. Silver,et al.  Optimizing hybrid metrology through a consistent multi-tool parameter set and uncertainty model , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Heather Patrick,et al.  Developing an uncertainty analysis for optical scatterometry , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Hermann Gross,et al.  The statistical inverse problem of scatterometry: Bayesian inference and the effect of different priors , 2015, Optical Metrology.

[11]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[12]  D. Xiu Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review , 2009 .

[13]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Quantifying parameter uncertainties in optical scatterometry using Bayesian inversion , 2017, Optical Metrology.

[14]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Clemens Elster,et al.  Improved reconstruction of critical dimensions in extreme ultraviolet scatterometry by modeling systematic errors , 2014 .

[16]  A. Cohen,et al.  Optimal weighted least-squares methods , 2016, 1608.00512.

[17]  C. Mack Fundamental principles of optical lithography : the science of microfabrication , 2007 .

[18]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Applicability of the Debye-Waller damping factor for the determination of the line-edge roughness of lamellar gratings. , 2019, Optics express.

[19]  Jan Richter,et al.  Deep ultraviolet scatterometer for dimensional characterization of nanostructures: system improvements and test measurements , 2011 .

[20]  B. M. Barnes,et al.  A Bayesian statistical model for hybrid metrology to improve measurement accuracy , 2011, Optical Metrology.

[21]  Frank Schmidt,et al.  Adaptive finite element method for simulation of optical nano structures , 2007, 0711.2149.

[22]  Sebastian Heidenreich,et al.  Efficient global sensitivity analysis for silicon line gratings using polynomial chaos , 2019, Optical Metrology.

[23]  W. T. Martin,et al.  The Orthogonal Development of Non-Linear Functionals in Series of Fourier-Hermite Functionals , 1947 .

[24]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Polynomial Chaos in Stochastic Finite Elements , 1990 .

[25]  Peter Monk,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations , 2003 .

[26]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[27]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Metrology of nanoscale grating structures by UV scatterometry. , 2017, Optics express.

[28]  L. Zschiedrich Transparent boundary conditions for Maxwell's equations: Numerical concepts beyond the PML method , 2009 .

[29]  Poul-Erik Hansen,et al.  Imaging scatterometry for flexible measurements of patterned areas. , 2016, Optics express.

[30]  Hermann Gross,et al.  BAYESIAN APPROACH TO THE STATISTICAL INVERSE PROBLEM OF SCATTEROMETRY: COMPARISON OF THREE SURROGATE MODELS , 2015 .

[31]  John R. McNeil,et al.  Metrology of subwavelength photoresist gratings using optical scatterometry , 1995 .

[32]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[33]  Clemens Elster,et al.  A surrogate model enables a Bayesian approach to the inverse problem of scatterometry , 2014 .

[34]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[35]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[36]  Hermann Gross,et al.  Bayesian approach to determine critical dimensions from scatterometric measurements , 2018, Metrologia.

[37]  Hsu-ting Huang,et al.  Spectroscopic ellipsometry and reflectometry from gratings (Scatterometry) for critical dimension measurement and in situ, real-time process monitoring , 2004 .

[38]  M. Badaroglu,et al.  Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices , 2018, Nature Electronics.

[39]  Clemens Elster,et al.  A maximum likelihood approach to the inverse problem of scatterometry. , 2012, Optics express.