Impact of Rubin Observatory Cadence Choices on Supernovae Photometric Classification

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will discover an unprecedented number of supernovae (SNe), making spectroscopic classification for all the events infeasible. LSST will thus rely on photometric classification, whose accuracy depends on the not-yet-finalized LSST observing strategy. In this work, we analyze the impact of cadence choices on classification performance using simulated multiband light curves. First, we simulate SNe with an LSST baseline cadence, a nonrolling cadence, and a presto-color cadence, which observes each sky location three times per night instead of twice. Each simulated data set includes a spectroscopically confirmed training set, which we augment to be representative of the test set as part of the classification pipeline. Then we use the photometric transient classification library snmachine to build classifiers. We find that the active region of the rolling cadence used in the baseline observing strategy yields a 25% improvement in classification performance relative to the background region. This improvement in performance in the actively rolling region is also associated with an increase of up to a factor of 2.7 in the number of cosmologically useful Type Ia SNe relative to the background region. However, adding a third visit per night as implemented in presto-color degrades classification performance due to more irregularly sampled light curves. Overall, our results establish desiderata on the observing cadence related to classification of full SNe light curves, which in turn impacts photometric SNe cosmology with LSST.

[1]  R. Kessler,et al.  The Simulated Catalogue of Optical Transients and Correlated Hosts (SCOTCH) , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[2]  H. Stevance,et al.  What can Gaussian Processes really tell us about supernova lightcurves? Consequences for Type II(b) morphologies and genealogies , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[3]  David O. Jones,et al.  The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  F. Förster,et al.  Deep Attention-based Supernovae Classification of Multiband Light Curves , 2022, The Astronomical Journal.

[5]  M. Sako,et al.  Photometric Classification of Early-time Supernova Light Curves with SCONE , 2021, The Astronomical Journal.

[6]  R. Biswas,et al.  Considerations for Optimizing the Photometric Classification of Supernovae from the Rubin Observatory , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[7]  I. Hook,et al.  The Impact of Observing Strategy on Cosmological Constraints with LSST , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[8]  Kyle Boone ParSNIP: Generative Models of Transient Light Curves with Physics-enabled Deep Learning , 2021, The Astronomical Journal.

[9]  I. Hook,et al.  Optimizing a magnitude-limited spectroscopic training sample for photometric classification of supernovae , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[10]  David O. Jones,et al.  SuperRAENN: A Semisupervised Supernova Photometric Classification Pipeline Trained on Pan-STARRS1 Medium-Deep Survey Supernovae , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al.  Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.

[12]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[13]  Scott F. Daniel,et al.  Enabling Catalog Simulations of Transient and Variable Sources Based on LSST Cadence Strategies , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[14]  A. Möller,et al.  SuperNNova: an open-source framework for Bayesian, neural network-based supernova classification , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[15]  Kyle Boone,et al.  Avocado: Photometric Classification of Astronomical Transients with Gaussian Process Augmentation , 2019, The Astronomical Journal.

[16]  Aaron O'Leary,et al.  PyWavelets: A Python package for wavelet analysis , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[17]  Gautham Narayan,et al.  RAPID: Early Classification of Explosive Transients Using Deep Learning , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[18]  A. J. Connolly,et al.  Models and Simulations for the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC) , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[19]  Marc Chaumont,et al.  PELICAN: deeP architecturE for the LIght Curve ANalysis , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[20]  I. Andreoni,et al.  Presto-Color: A Photometric Survey Cadence for Explosive Physics and Fast Transients , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[21]  N. E. Sommer,et al.  First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  Robert J. Vanderbei,et al.  A Framework for Telescope Schedulers: With Applications to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[23]  A. A. Mahabal,et al.  The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge PLAsTiCC: Selection of a Performance Metric for Classification Probabilities Balancing Diverse Science Goals , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[24]  Eduardo Serrano,et al.  LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , 2008, The Astrophysical Journal.

[25]  S. Rodney,et al.  Extending Supernova Spectral Templates for Next-generation Space Telescope Observations , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[26]  Miguel de Val-Borro,et al.  The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[27]  David O. Jones,et al.  The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.

[28]  David A. van Dyk,et al.  STACCATO: a novel solution to supernova photometric classification with biased training sets , 2017, 1706.03811.

[29]  David O. Jones,et al.  Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters , 2017, 1710.00846.

[30]  Gautham Narayan,et al.  MOSFiT: Modular Open Source Fitter for Transients , 2017, 1710.02145.

[31]  E. Berger,et al.  Theoretical Models of Optical Transients. I. A Broad Exploration of the Duration–Luminosity Phase Space , 2017, 1707.08132.

[32]  B. Bassett,et al.  zBEAMS: a unified solution for supernova cosmology with redshift uncertainties , 2017, 1704.07830.

[33]  A. Riess,et al.  Measuring the Properties of Dark Energy with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. I. Systematic Uncertainty from Core-collapse Supernova Contamination , 2016, 1611.07042.

[34]  R. Kessler,et al.  Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples , 2016, 1610.04677.

[35]  O. Graur,et al.  Revisiting the Lick Observatory Supernova Search Volume-limited Sample: Updated Classifications and Revised Stripped-envelope Supernova Fractions , 2016, 1609.02922.

[36]  Tom Charnock,et al.  Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Supernovae Classification , 2016, ArXiv.

[37]  O. Lahav,et al.  PHOTOMETRIC SUPERNOVA CLASSIFICATION WITH MACHINE LEARNING , 2016, 1603.00882.

[38]  M. Sullivan,et al.  THE DIFFERENCE IMAGING PIPELINE FOR THE TRANSIENT SEARCH IN THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY , 2015, 1507.05137.

[39]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples , 2014, 1401.4064.

[40]  Prasanth H. Nair,et al.  Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.

[41]  J. Frieman,et al.  TESTING MODELS OF INTRINSIC BRIGHTNESS VARIATIONS IN TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE AND THEIR IMPACT ON MEASURING COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS , 2012, 1209.2482.

[42]  M. Kunz,et al.  Extending BEAMS to incorporate correlated systematic uncertainties , 2012, 1205.3493.

[43]  M. Sullivan,et al.  The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints , , 2010, 1010.4743.

[44]  N. S. Philip,et al.  Results from the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge , 2010, 1008.1024.

[45]  J. Vanderplas,et al.  FIRST-YEAR SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNOVA RESULTS: HUBBLE DIAGRAM AND COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS , 2009, 0908.4274.

[46]  Jake Vanderplas,et al.  SNANA: A Public Software Package for Supernova Analysis , 2009, 0908.4280.

[47]  M. Sullivan,et al.  SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators , 2007, astro-ph/0701828.

[48]  J. Neill,et al.  The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda,and w from the First Year Data Set , 2005, astro-ph/0510447.

[49]  S. Woods,et al.  The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. S. 211-215 , 2005 .

[50]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[51]  Guido Rossum,et al.  Python Library Reference , 1999 .

[52]  A. Riess,et al.  Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , 1998, astro-ph/9805201.

[53]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[54]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .