Evaluation of Features for Electrode Location Robustness in Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system that provides an output channel for the brain and does not depend on peripheral muscles and nerves. In other words, a BCI system interprets a brain activity as simple commands and transforms brain activities into prescribed actions within its applications, i.e. the control of a wheelchair or a robot arm. The electroencephalogram (EEG) is one of non-invasive methods to record brain activities and it records electrical activities generated by cerebral cortex nerve cells from the human scalp with electrodes. EEG-based brain-computer interface has been studied actively for its a great potential for diagnoses of brain neuro-degenerative diseases and advantages such as completely non-invasive procedure that can be applied repeatedly to patients, normal adults, and children with virtually no risk or limitation and its reasonable cost. Diverse types of electrical brain activities have been used to realize EEG-based BCI systems, e.g., mu rhythm, slow cortical potential, event-related p300, and steady-state visual evoked potential. Among these activities, the one most widely used to monitor brain activities for BCI applications has been the mu (_) rhythm, which is related to motor actions. Motor imagery (MI) is the state during which the representation of a specific motor action is internally reactivated within the working memory without any overt motor output and that is governed by the principles of motor control. MI can modulate mu rhythm activities in the sensorimotor cortex without any physical movements of the body.

[1]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Online Control of a Brain-Computer Interface Using Phase Synchronization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Philippe Renevey,et al.  SVM-based recursive feature elimination to compare phase synchronization computed from broadband and narrowband EEG signals in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2005, Signal Process..

[4]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Chiew Tong Lau,et al.  A New Discriminative Common Spatial Pattern Method for Motor Imagery Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  E. Gysels,et al.  Phase synchronization for the recognition of mental tasks in a brain-computer interface , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  E Gysels,et al.  Fast feature selection to compare broadband with narrowband phase synchronization in brain-computer interfaces. , 2007, Methods of information in medicine.

[9]  Han-Jeong Hwang,et al.  Neurofeedback-based motor imagery training for brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Ruth Dickstein,et al.  Integration of Motor Imagery and Physical Practice in Group Treatment Applied to Subjects With Parkinson’s Disease , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  M. Teplan FUNDAMENTALS OF EEG MEASUREMENT , 2002 .