The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study.

OBJECTIVE To describe the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) Version 2.3 and to provide data on its performance characteristics in the Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study. METHOD Data were collected on the DISC-2.3 at four sites on 1,285 randomly selected children, aged 9 through 17 years, and their parents. Two hundred forty-seven of these child-parent pairs were reassessed on the DISC-2.3 by a clinician interviewer, 1 to 3 weeks later. RESULTS Administration time was approximately 1 hour and the interview was acceptable to more than 90% of subjects. The reliability of questions to parents assessing impairment and age of onset was generally good to acceptable for most diagnoses but was less satisfactory for the child interview. Using information from parent and child, the prevalence for any diagnosis ranged from 50.6 if no impairment criteria were required to 5.4 if a Global Assessment Scale score of 50 or less was necessary. The prevalence of anxiety disorders and enuresis was markedly reduced by requiring attributable impairment. CONCLUSIONS The DISC-2 is a reliable and economical tool for assessing child psychopathology. Reliability of the DISC-P-2.3 is superior to that of the child DISC for most diagnoses but is least good for anxiety disorders. The 2.3 version of the instrument provides a significant improvement over earlier versions.

[1]  B. Dohrenwend,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of childhood psychopathology. A critical review. , 1981, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.

[2]  M. Davies,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): II. Test-retest reliability. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[3]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  The Recall Method in Social Surveys. , 1980 .

[4]  M. Gould,et al.  Aggregating data from multiple informants in child psychiatry epidemiological research. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[5]  H. Kraemer Ramifications of a population model forκ as a coefficient of reliability , 1979 .

[6]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys , 1993 .

[7]  G. Canino,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of childhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico. The use of combined measures. , 1988, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[9]  Prevalence of Childhood and Adolescent Depression in the Community , 1989, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[10]  G. Canino,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms. , 1995, Archives of general psychiatry.

[11]  M Davies,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Recollections of childhood. A study of the retrospective method. , 1970, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. , 1976, Archives of general psychiatry.

[14]  C. Corcoran,et al.  Psychiatric disorders in a community sample of adolescents. , 1987, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Effects of Time and Memory Factors on Response in Surveys , 1973 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Combining discrepant diagnostic information from multiple sources: Are complex algorithms better than simple ones? , 1992, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[17]  G. Canino,et al.  Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[18]  J. Breton,et al.  Do children aged 9 through 11 years understand the DISC Version 2.25 questions? , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[19]  D. Shaffer,et al.  The Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS): Pilot findings on a measure of global impairment for children and adolescents. , 1993 .

[20]  E. Costello,et al.  Developments in child psychiatric epidemiology. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[21]  J. Piacentini,et al.  Sensitivity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, 2nd edition (DISC-2.1) for specific diagnoses of children and adolescents. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[22]  L. Luborsky Clinicians' Judgments of Mental Health: A Proposed Scale , 1962 .

[23]  M. Davies,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): III. Concurrent criterion validity. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[24]  M. Weissman,et al.  The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study: background and methodology. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[25]  C. Friedenreich,et al.  Improving long-term recall in epidemiologic studies. , 1994, Epidemiology.

[26]  M. Schwab-Stone,et al.  Reliability of diagnostic reporting for children aged 6-11 years: a test-retest study of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised. , 1994, The American journal of psychiatry.

[27]  E F Loftus,et al.  Since the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, has anyone beaten you up? Improving the accuracy of retrospective reports with landmarkevents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[28]  James Robert Brašić,et al.  A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.