Evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: Triangulation of Findings Based on Different Evaluation Strategies

There are different adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong, such as mental health problems, abuse of psychotropic substances, adolescent suicide, school violence, and drop in family solidarity, that deserve the attention of helping professionals[1]. With reference to these problems, primary prevention programs that target specific adolescent developmental problems and positive youth development programs are called for. Furthermore, attempts to identify the "at-risk" adolescents at an earlier stage are important. However, research findings show that there are very few systematic and multiyear positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. Even if such programs exist, they commonly deal with isolated problems and issues in adolescent development (i.e., deficits-oriented programs) and they are relatively short term in nature. In addition, systematic and long-term evaluation of the available programs does not exist[2].

[1]  Ruth P Saunders,et al.  Developing a Process-Evaluation Plan for Assessing Health Promotion Program Implementation: A How-To Guide , 2005, Health promotion practice.

[2]  Charles B. Fleming,et al.  Opening the Black Box: Using Process Evaluation Measures to Assess Implementation and Theory Building , 1999, American journal of community psychology.

[3]  R. Catalano,et al.  Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs , 2004 .

[4]  D. Shek,et al.  Quality of Life in the Global Context: A Chinese Response , 2005 .

[5]  Robert W. Weinbach,et al.  Evaluating Social Work Services and Programs , 2004 .

[6]  D. Shek.  Effectiveness of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Preliminary Objective and Subjective Outcome Evaluation Findings , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[7]  Rachel C. F. Sun,et al.  Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Qualitative Findings Based on the Experiences of Program Participants , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[8]  Mark T. Greenberg,et al.  The Study of Implementation: Current Findings From Effective Programs that Prevent Mental Disorders in School-Aged Children , 2000 .

[9]  C. Mahoney,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Comprehensive Community Initiatives , 2003, Health promotion practice.

[10]  D. Shek.  Conceptual framework underlying the development of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. , 2006, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[11]  D. Shek,et al.  Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on the Perspective of the Program Participants , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[12]  D. Shek,et al.  Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Qualitative Findings Based on the Experiences of Program Implementers , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[13]  D. Shek.  Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: Relevance to Positive Youth Development Programs in Hong Kong , 2006, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[14]  A. Siu,et al.  Subjective Outcome Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Findings Based on the Perspective of the Program Implementers , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[15]  Cindy A. Crusto,et al.  What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[16]  Convergence of Subjective Outcome and Objective Outcome Evaluation Findings: Insights Based on the Project P.A.T.H.S. , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[17]  Daniel T. L. Shek,et al.  Process Evaluation of the Implementation of the Secondary 2 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S. in the Experimental Implementation Phase , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  D. Shek,et al.  Application of Social Constructionist Principles in Field Practice Teaching in a Chinese Context , 2007 .

[19]  D. Shek,et al.  Design of a Positive Youth Development Program in Hong Kong , 2006, International journal of adolescent medicine and health.

[20]  Barbara A. Israel,et al.  Process evaluation for public health interventions and research , 2002 .

[21]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[22]  Rachel C. F. Sun,et al.  Evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: Utilization of Student Weekly Diary , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[23]  A. Siu,et al.  Qualitative Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. Based on the Perceptions of the Program Participants , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[24]  N. Tobler,et al.  Effectiveness of School-Based Drug Prevention Programs for Marijuana Use , 1999 .

[25]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[26]  Hing Keung Ma,et al.  Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[27]  Andrew V. Dane,et al.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[28]  Joseph A. Durlak,et al.  Successful Prevention Programs for Children and Adolescents , 1997 .

[29]  Walter W. Hudson,et al.  Practice Evaluation for the 21st Century , 2001 .

[30]  D. Shek,et al.  Implementation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: Interim Evaluation Findings , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[31]  C. Russon,et al.  Evaluation standards in an international context , 2004 .