Influence of Spatial Structure on Accuracy of Interpolation Methods

Effectiveness of precision agriculture depends on accurate and efficient mapping of soil properties. Among the factors that most affect soil property mapping are the number of soil samples, the distance between sampling locations, and the choice of interpolation procedures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of data variability and the strength of spatial correlation in the data on the performance of (i) grid soil sampling of different sampling density and (ii) two interpolation procedures, ordinary point kriging and optimal inverse distance weighting (IDW). Soil properties with coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from 12 to 67% were sampled in a 20-ha field using a regular grid with a 30-m distance between grid points. Data sets with different spatial structures were simulated based on the soil sample data using a simulated annealing procedure. The strength of simulated spatial structures ranged from weak with nugget to sill (N/S) ratio of 0.6 to strong (N/S ratio of 0.1). The results indicated that regardless of CV values, soil properties with a strong spatial structure were mapped more accurately than those that had weak spatial structure. Kriging with known variogram parameters performed significantly better than the IDW for most of the studied cases (P < 0.01). However, when variogram parameters were determined from sample variograms, kriging was as accurate as the IDW only for sufficiently large data sets, but was less precise when a reliable sample variogram could not be obtained from the data.

[1]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  HOW MANY OBSERVATIONS ARE NEEDED FOR REGIONAL ESTIMATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES? , 1983 .

[2]  F. Agterberg,et al.  Trend Surface Analysis , 2021, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[3]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH , 1987 .

[4]  P. Burrough,et al.  Comparison of spatial prediction methods for mapping floodplain soil pollution , 1990 .

[5]  D. Weber,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II , 1992 .

[6]  R. Webster,et al.  Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties , 1992 .

[7]  M. Clayton,et al.  Mapping Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium for Variable‐Rate Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[8]  J. Sawyer.  Concepts of Variable Rate Technology with Considerations for Fertilizer Application , 1994 .

[9]  David W. Franzen,et al.  Field Soil Sampling Density for Variable Rate Fertilization , 1995 .

[10]  R. Weisz,et al.  Map Generation in High-Value Horticultural Integrated Pest Management: Appropriate Interpolation Methods for Site-Specific Pest Management of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) , 1995 .

[11]  C. Gotway,et al.  Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters , 1996 .

[12]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil chemical analytical accuracy and costs: implications from precision agriculture , 1998 .

[13]  Douglas L. Karlen,et al.  Spatial scale requirements for precision farming: a case study in the southeastern USA , 1998 .

[14]  Donald G. Bullock,et al.  A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties , 1999 .

[15]  J. W. Groenigen,et al.  Constrained optimisation of soil sampling for minimisation of the kriging variance , 1999 .

[16]  F. J. Pierce,et al.  Map Quality for Site‐Specific Fertility Management , 2001 .

[17]  Randal K. Taylor,et al.  Evaluating the Potential for Site‐Specific Phosphorus Applications Without High‐Density Soil Sampling , 2002 .

[18]  M. J. Pringle,et al.  Estimating Average and Proportional Variograms of Soil Properties and Their Potential Use in Precision Agriculture , 1999, Precision Agriculture.

[19]  Jiyul Chang,et al.  Precision Farming Protocols: Part 1. Grid Distance and Soil Nutrient Impact on the Reproducibility of Spatial Variability Measurements , 1999, Precision Agriculture.

[20]  J. Bailey,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Mapping Soil Phosphorus and Soil Potassium Distributions in Cool Temperate Grassland , 2000, Precision Agriculture.