Microswitch technology and contingent stimulation to promote adaptive engagement in persons with minimally conscious state: a case evaluation

This study assessed whether a post-coma woman functioning at the lower end of the minimally conscious state would (a) develop adaptive responding through the use of microswitch technology and contingent stimulation, (b) consolidate and maintain her responding over time, and (c) show evidence of response-consequences awareness (learning and discrimination). The study involved an ABABB1CB1 sequence in which the A represented baseline phases, the B and B1 intervention phases, and the C a control phase with continuous stimulation. Results indicated that the woman developed adaptive responding and consolidated it over the intervention phases of the study. The woman also showed evidence of being aware of response-consequences links. Potential implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities , 2009, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[2]  Marta Olivetti Belardinelli,et al.  Learning as a possible sign of non-reflective consciousness in persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[3]  L. Cohen,et al.  Contribution of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Understanding of Functional Recovery Mechanisms After Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[5]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Post-coma persons with extensive multiple disabilities use microswitch technology to access selected stimulus events or operate a radio device. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[6]  W. Magee,et al.  Music therapy with patients in low awareness states: Approaches to assessment and treatment in multidisciplinary care , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[7]  Steven Laureys,et al.  From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness , 2011, Journal of Neurology.

[8]  Joseph T. Giacino,et al.  Rehabilitative Management of Patients With Disorders of Consciousness: Grand Rounds , 2004, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[9]  M. Coleman,et al.  Detecting residual cognitive function in disorders of consciousness. , 2011, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Matteis,et al.  Active music therapy in the rehabilitation of severe brain injured patients during coma recovery. , 2001, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[11]  Mark F. O’Reilly,et al.  Post-coma Persons with Minimal Consciousness and Motor Disabilities Learn to Use Assistive Communication Technology to Seek Environmental Stimulation , 2010 .

[12]  W. W. Daniel.  Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[13]  Joseph T. Giacino,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegwive and minimally conscious states , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[14]  F. Plum,et al.  Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Steven Laureys,et al.  What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious? , 2007, Current opinion in neurology.

[16]  Angelo Canedo,et al.  An analysis of assessment instruments for the minimally responsive patient (MRP): clinical observations , 2002, Brain injury.

[17]  Gwyn Lewis,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-associated neurobehavioral gains during coma recovery , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Behavior modification in applied settings , 1975 .

[19]  Craig H. Kennedy,et al.  Single-Case Designs for Educational Research , 2004 .

[20]  Marta Olivetti Belardinelli,et al.  Evaluation of technology-assisted learning setups for undertaking assessment and providing intervention to persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state , 2009, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[21]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[22]  Diana Velikonja,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of two clinical training procedures to elicit yes/no responses from patients with a severe acquired brain injury: a randomized single-subject design , 2003, Brain injury.

[23]  W. Magee.  Music as a diagnostic tool in low awareness states: Considering limbic responses , 2007, Brain injury.

[24]  F. Plum,et al.  Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Erik W. Carter,et al.  Self-Determination Prospects of Youth With High-Incidence Disabilities , 2010 .

[26]  K. Chua,et al.  A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. , 2007, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[27]  Giulio E. Lancioni,et al.  A Microswitch to Enable a Woman with Acquired Brain Injury and Profound Multiple Disabilities to Access Environmental Stimulation with LIP Movements , 2010, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  C. Schnakers,et al.  Disorders of consciousness: what's in a name? , 2011, NeuroRehabilitation.

[29]  Marta Olivetti Belardinelli,et al.  An overview of intervention options for promoting adaptive behavior of persons with acquired brain injury and minimally conscious state. , 2010, Research in developmental disabilities.

[30]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK coma recovery scale—revised , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[31]  John Whyte,et al.  Treatments to enhance recovery from the vegetative and minimally conscious states: ethical issues surrounding efficacy studies. , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.