The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps

Software applications (apps) are now prevalent in the digital media environment. They are the site of significant sociocultural and economic transformations across many domains, from health and relationships to entertainment and everyday finance. As relatively closed technical systems, apps pose new methodological challenges for sociocultural digital media research. This article describes a method, grounded in a combination of science and technology studies with cultural studies, through which researchers can perform a critical analysis of a given app. The method involves establishing an app’s environment of expected use by identifying and describing its vision, operating model and modes of governance. It then deploys a walkthrough technique to systematically and forensically step through the various stages of app registration and entry, everyday use and discontinuation of use. The walkthrough method establishes a foundational corpus of data upon which can be built a more detailed analysis of an app’s intended purpose, embedded cultural meanings and implied ideal users and uses. The walkthrough also serves as a foundation for further user-centred research that can identify how users resist these arrangements and appropriate app technology for their own purposes.

[1]  Michael Zimmer,et al.  “Making the world more open and connected”: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users , 2018, New Media Soc..

[2]  Jonathan Lillie,et al.  Nokia’s MMS: A cultural analysis of mobile picture messaging , 2012, New Media Soc..

[3]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Ubiquitous apps: politics of openness in global mobile cultures , 2011, Digit. Creativity.

[4]  Jean Burgess,et al.  The iPhone Moment, the Apple Brand, and the Creative Consumer: From “Hackability and Usability” to Cultural Generativity , 2012 .

[5]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[6]  David B. Nieborg,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Crushing Candy : The Free-to-Play Game in Its Connective Commodity Form , 2015 .

[7]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn , 2015 .

[8]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app , 2015, New Media Soc..

[9]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Background and Issues , 1997 .

[10]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman , 1997 .

[11]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[12]  Ben Light,et al.  Mobile dating and hookup app culture , 2017 .

[13]  Christian Sandvig,et al.  Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook , 2018, New Media Soc..

[14]  S. Bartky,et al.  Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power , 2020 .

[15]  David Mason,et al.  Digital Methods , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[16]  Michael E. Fagan.  Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development , 1976, IBM Syst. J..

[17]  Theo Röhle,et al.  Digital Methods: Five Challenges , 2012 .

[18]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Reality and Perception of Copyright Terms of Service for Online Content Creation , 2016, CSCW.

[19]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[20]  Kristian Møller Jørgensen.  The media go-along: Researching mobilities with media at hand , 2016 .

[21]  Ba Light.  Producing sexual cultures and pseudonymous publics with digital networks , 2016 .

[22]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[23]  André Brock,et al.  From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation , 2012 .

[24]  Bruce W. Finklea.  Nurturing New Men and Polishing Imperfect Fathers Via Hetero- and Homosocial Relationships in Pixar Films , 2016 .

[25]  J. Dijck.  The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[26]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Ben Light.  Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites , 2014 .

[29]  Stefanie Duguay.  Dressing up Tinderella: interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder , 2016 .

[30]  Stefanie Duguay.  Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Visibility Through Selfies: Comparing Platform Mediators Across Ruby Rose’s Instagram and Vine Presence , 2016 .

[31]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[32]  Joshua McVeigh-Schultz,et al.  Thinking of You: Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App, Couple , 2015 .

[33]  Siva K. Balasubramanian,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Three Communication Formats: Advertising, Infomercial, and Direct Experience , 2000 .

[34]  Ben Light,et al.  Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: Rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook , 2014, New Media Soc..

[35]  Ron Eglash,et al.  Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science And Social Power , 2004 .

[36]  M. Callon.  Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis , 1987 .

[37]  Ben Light,et al.  The rise of speculative devices: Hooking up with the bots of Ashley Madison , 2016, First Monday.

[38]  Seung Hwan Lee,et al.  Learning the ShamWow: Creating Infomercials to Teach the AIDA Model , 2015 .

[39]  Lisa Nakamura.  Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet , 2002 .

[40]  Sharif Mowlabocus,et al.  Revisiting old haunts through new technologies , 2008 .

[41]  Martin P. Robillard,et al.  How API Documentation Fails , 2015, IEEE Software.

[42]  Peter A. Smith,et al.  Let's Play, Video Streams, and the Evolution of New Digital Literacy , 2015, HCI.

[43]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The Affordances of Social Media Platforms , 2018 .

[44]  Bryan Pfaffenberger,et al.  Technological Dramas , 1992 .

[45]  Hayley Watson,et al.  Digital Methods for Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Guide to Research Innovation , 2015 .

[46]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  Television: Technology and Cultural Form , 1978 .

[47]  Brady Robards,et al.  Making It “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use , 2016 .

[48]  Jed R. Brubaker,et al.  Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr , 2016, New Media Soc..

[49]  Cameron D. Palmer,et al.  Association Testing of Previously Reported Variants in a Large Case-Control Meta-analysis of Diabetic Nephropathy , 2011, Diabetes.

[50]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[51]  Sara M. Grimes,et al.  Little Big Scene , 2015 .

[52]  Ben Light,et al.  Gay men, Gaydar and the commodification of difference , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[53]  Ben Light,et al.  Ethics and social networking sites: a disclosive analysis of Facebook , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[54]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[55]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[56]  P. Gummett.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1988 .