Accuracy required and achievable in radiotherapy dosimetry: have modern technology and techniques changed our views?

In this review of the accuracy required and achievable in radiotherapy dosimetry, older approaches and evidence-based estimates for 3DCRT have been reprised, summarising and drawing together the author's earlier evaluations where still relevant. Available evidence for IMRT uncertainties has been reviewed, selecting information from tolerances, QA, verification measurements, in vivo dosimetry and dose delivery audits, to consider whether achievable uncertainties increase or decrease for current advanced treatments and practice. Overall there is some evidence that they tend to increase, but that similar levels should be achievable. Thus it is concluded that those earlier estimates of achievable dosimetric accuracy are still applicable, despite the changes and advances in technology and techniques. The one exception is where there is significant lung involvement, where it is likely that uncertainties have now improved due to widespread use of more accurate heterogeneity models. Geometric uncertainties have improved with the wide availability of IGRT.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  B. McCurdy Dosimetry in radiotherapy using a-Si EPIDs: Systems, methods, and applications focusing on 3D patient dose estimation , 2013 .

[3]  Westgate Road,et al.  Report 96 - Guidance for the Clinical Implementation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2004 .

[4]  C. De Wagter,et al.  An inter-centre quality assurance network for IMRT verification: results of the ESTRO QUASIMODO project. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  A. Dutreix When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy? , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  V Feygelman,et al.  Dosimetric quality assurance of highly conformal external beam treatments: from 2D phantom comparisons to 4D patient dose reconstruction , 2013 .

[8]  D. Thwaites,et al.  A dosimetric intercomparison of kilovoltage X-rays, megavoltage photons and electrons in the Republic of Ireland. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  J. Malicki,et al.  Physics and technology in ESTRO and in Radiotherapy and Oncology: past, present and into the 4th dimension. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  D Verellen,et al.  Conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer: increased biochemical failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning computed tomogram despite image guidance by implanted markers. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  D. Olsen,et al.  Quality assurance of dosimetry and the impact on sample size in randomized clinical trials. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  J. Palta,et al.  Uncertainties in External Beam Radiation Therapy , 2011 .

[13]  D. Thwaites,et al.  Physics and high-technology advances in radiotherapy: are they still worth it? , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Sören Mattsson,et al.  Prevention of accidental exposures to patients undergoing radiation therapy , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Smathers,et al.  The Modern Technology of Radiation Oncology: A Compendium for Medical Physicists and Radiation Oncologists , 1999 .

[18]  S. Bentzen Steepness of the radiation dose-response curve for dose-per-fraction escalation keeping the number of fractions fixed , 2005, Acta oncologica.

[19]  Stanislav Vatnitsky,et al.  Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: results of IAEA pilot study. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  P. Williams,et al.  A national dosimetric audit of IMRT. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[22]  Lei Dong,et al.  Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[23]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[24]  David S Followill,et al.  Challenges in credentialing institutions and participants in advanced technology multi-institutional clinical trials. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  P. Hoskin,et al.  Three-dimensional distribution of radiation within the breast: an intercomparison of departments participating in the START trial of breast radiotherapy fractionation. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  David S Followill,et al.  Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[28]  Peter B. Greer,et al.  3D EPID based dosimetry for pre-treatment verification of VMAT – methods and challenges , 2013 .

[29]  Teh Lin,et al.  Uncertainties in IMRT dosimetry. , 2010, Medical physics.

[30]  J. Sonke,et al.  3D EPID-based in vivo dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT , 2013 .

[31]  Pedro Andreo,et al.  The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  Benjamin E Nelms,et al.  Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors. , 2011, Medical physics.

[33]  A Brahme,et al.  Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[34]  J. Palta,et al.  Application of a novel dose-uncertainty model for dose-uncertainty analysis in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  M van Herk,et al.  Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry. , 2010, Medical physics.

[36]  M. Herk Errors and margins in radiotherapy. , 2004 .

[37]  J. Seuntjens,et al.  A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. , 2008, Medical physics.

[38]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Physical Aspects of Quality Assurance in Radiation Therapy , 1984 .

[39]  S. Bhide,et al.  Dosimetry audit for a multi-centre IMRT head and neck trial. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[40]  S S Korreman Semi- and virtual 3D dosimetry in clinical practice , 2013 .

[41]  Alan E. Nahum,et al.  Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[42]  A Wambersie,et al.  What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy? , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[43]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .

[44]  J M Wilkinson,et al.  Geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[45]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  A generalized a priori dose uncertainty model of IMRT delivery. , 2008, Medical physics.

[46]  D I Thwaites,et al.  A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Tommy Knöös,et al.  Clinical implications of the implementation of advanced treatment planning algorithms for thoracic treatments. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[48]  Timothy C Zhu,et al.  Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. , 2008, Medical physics.

[49]  D Thwaites,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy , 1995 .

[50]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[51]  Ria Bogaerts,et al.  Practical guidelines for the implementation of in vivo dosimetry with diodes in external radiotherapy with photon beams (entrance dose) , 2001 .

[52]  Stine Korreman,et al.  The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[53]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.