Compression Fitting of Hearing Aids and Implementation

A compressor in hearing aid devices (HADs) is responsible for mapping the dynamic range of input signals to the residual dynamic range of hearing-impaired (HI) patients. Gains and parameters of the compressor are set according to the HI patient’s preferences. In different surroundings depending upon noise level, the patient may seek to tune the parameters to improve performance. Traditionally, fitting of the hearing aids is done by an audiologist using hearing aid software and the HI patient’s opinion at a clinic. In this paper, we propose a frequency-based multi-band compressor implemented as a smartphone application, which can be used as an alternative to that of the traditional HADs. The proposed solution allows the user to tune the compression parameters for each band along with a choice of compression speed and fitting strategy. Exploiting smartphone processing and hardware capabilities, the application can be used for bilateral hearing loss. The performance of this easy-to-use smartphone-based application is compared with traditional HADs using a hearing aid test system. Objective and subjective evaluations are also carried out to quantify the performance.

[1]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[2]  Robert L. Brennan,et al.  A multichannel compression strategy for a digital hearing aid , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[3]  F K Kuk Theoretical and Practical Considerations in Compression Hearing Aids , 1996, Trends in amplification.

[4]  J. Pätynen FFT-BASED DYNAMIC RANGE COMPRESSION , 2017 .

[5]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0a hearing aid prescription for adults , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[6]  G. Keidser,et al.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure , 2011, Audiology research.

[7]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  An Educational Tool for Hearing Aid Compression Fitting via a Web-based Adjusted Smartphone App , 2019, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[8]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[10]  Joshua D. Reiss,et al.  Digital Dynamic Range Compressor Design—A Tutorial and Analysis , 2012 .

[11]  Eric Seper,et al.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor. , 2018, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Peninah S Rosengard,et al.  Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  E W Yund,et al.  Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[15]  H Levitt,et al.  Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R C Seewald,et al.  Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[17]  K W Berger,et al.  A reexamination of the one-half gain rule. , 1980, Ear and hearing.