Flecainide for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain: a Phase II trial

Background : Management of neuropathic pain is challenging. Medications that interfere with sodium channel transport, such as lidocaine, mexilitene and flecainide, are promising as analgesics. Objective : In a general population of patients with a working diagnosis of neuropathic pain, whether if flecainide produces enough of an improvement in pain to warrant further clinical study is determined. Design : Phase I/II prospective exploratory clinical trial. Eligible patients were observed for week 1, then 50 mg flecainide was administered twice daily for week 2 and then administered 100 mg twice daily for week 3. Setting/ Subjects : Multi-institutional members of the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group. Patients had neuropathic pain diagnosed by their oncologists as defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain and a diagnosis of cancer or AIDS. Measurements : The Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory was used. The primary endpoint was a decrease of 3 points (0—10 numerical scale) or a decrease of 50% in the worst pain rating at either day 15 or day 22 relative to the average of days 1 and 8 ratings. Results : Nineteen patients were registered for the study. Four patients were ineligible. Of the remaining 15, one was unevaluable due to incomplete pain rating. Four out of 14 patients had an average drop of 5 points or 53% in their worst pain ratings on a 0—10 numerical scale of pain. No patients withdrew from study because of toxicity. There were no life-threatening or lethal toxicities. All patients were alive at the time of the analysis. Conclusions : Flecainide produced a 30% response rate. Response in this study was defined to be highly relevant and clinically significant reduction in pain. The drug merits study in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21 : 667—672

[1]  C. Cahill,et al.  Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the clinician , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[2]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis , 2006, European journal of pain.

[3]  M. Fallon,et al.  The principles of cancer pain management. , 2006, Clinical medicine.

[4]  C. V. von Gunten,et al.  Intravenous lidocaine relieves severe pain: results of an inpatient hospice chart review. , 2004, Journal of palliative medicine.

[5]  F. Ferris,et al.  Ensuring competency in end-of-life care: controlling symptoms , 2002, BMC palliative care.

[6]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  D. Brookoff Chronic Pain: 1. A New Disease? , 2000, Hospital practice.

[8]  T. Yaksh,et al.  Concentration–Effect Relationship of Intravenous Lidocaine on the Allodynia of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Types I and II , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[9]  P. Sloan,et al.  Mexiletine as an adjuvant analgesic for the management of neuropathic cancer pain. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  Hanry J.L.Marriott,et al.  Advanced concepts in arrhythmias , 1998 .

[11]  L. Sorkin,et al.  Intravenous lidocaine: effects on controlling pain after anti-GD2 antibody therapy in children with neuroblastoma--a report of a series. , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  T. Yaksh,et al.  Concentration‐effect Relations for Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions in Human Volunteers: Effects on Acute Sensory Thresholds and Capsaicin‐evoked Hyperpathia , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[13]  T. Yaksh,et al.  Computer-controlled lidocaine infusion for the evaluation of neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury , 1996, Pain.

[14]  V. Ventafridda,et al.  Pain control and the World Health Organization analgesic ladder. , 1996, JAMA.

[15]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  The Sicilian gambit. A new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1991, Circulation.

[16]  H L Greene,et al.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  K. Brøsen Recent Developments in Hepatic Drug Oxidation Implications for Clinical Pharmacokinetics , 1990, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[18]  J. Stjernswärd,et al.  The cancer pain relief programme of the World Health Organization , 1990 .

[19]  R. Collins,et al.  Effects of prophylactic lidocaine in suspected acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from the randomized, controlled trials. , 1988, JAMA.

[20]  J. Hockley,et al.  ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF ORAL FLECAINIDE , 1988, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Kastrup,et al.  MEXILETINE FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAINFUL DIABETIC NEUROPATHY , 1988, The Lancet.

[22]  Y. Ito,et al.  Management of Intractable Pain in Adiposis Dolorosa with Intravenous Administration of Lidocaine , 1976, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  R. Portenoy,et al.  How to use antidepressants and anticonvulsants as adjuvant analgesics in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain. , 2006, The journal of supportive oncology.

[24]  J. Paice,et al.  How to initiate and monitor infusional lidocaine for severe and/or neuropathic pain. , 2004, The journal of supportive oncology.

[25]  K. Brøsen,et al.  Clinical significance of the sparteine/debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[26]  R. Ferrini Parenteral lidocaine for severe intractable pain in six hospice patients continued at home. , 2000, Journal of palliative medicine.

[27]  下山正徳 National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria , 1999 .

[28]  Michael R. Rosen,et al.  The 'Sicilian Gambit' - A new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms , 1991 .