Combining Higher Order Abstract Syntax with Tactical Theorem Proving and (Co)Induction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dale Miller,et al. Reasoning with higher-order abstract syntax in a logical framework , 2000, TOCL.
[2] S. Abramsky. The lazy lambda calculus , 1990 .
[3] Frank Pfenning,et al. System Description: Twelf - A Meta-Logical Framework for Deductive Systems , 1999, CADE.
[4] Amy P. Felty,et al. Higher-Order Abstract Syntax in Coq , 1995, TLCA.
[5] Elsa L. Gunter. Why we can't have SML-style datatype Declarations in HOL , 1992, TPHOLs.
[6] Nick Benton,et al. Monads, Effects and Transformations , 1999, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..
[7] Martin Hofmann. Semantical analysis of higher-order abstract syntax , 1999, Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158).
[8] Andrew D. Gordon,et al. Five Axioms of Alpha-Conversion , 1996, TPHOLs.
[9] T. Melham. A mechanized theory of the π-calculus in HOL , 1992 .
[10] Andrew M. Pitts,et al. A new approach to abstract syntax involving binders , 1999, Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158).
[11] Patrick J. Hayes,et al. Computation and Deduction , 1973, MFCS.
[12] Marino Miculan. Developing (Meta)Theory of Lambda-calculus in the Theory of Context , 2001, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..
[13] Furio Honsell,et al. An Axiomatic Approach to Metareasoning on Nominal Algebras in HOAS , 2001, ICALP.
[14] Joachim Parrow,et al. An Introduction to the π-Calculus , 2001, Handbook of Process Algebra.
[15] Joëlle Despeyroux,et al. Metatheoretic results for a modal-calculus , 2000 .
[16] Gordon D. Plotkin,et al. Abstract syntax and variable binding , 1999, Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158).
[17] James Brotherston,et al. A formalised first-order confluence proof for the -calculus using one-sorted variable names , 2003, Inf. Comput..
[18] Marino Miculan,et al. Developing (Meta)Theory of λ-calculus in the Theory of Contexts1 1Work partially supported by Italian MURST project tosca and EC-WG types. , 2001 .
[19] Frank Pfenning,et al. Primitive recursion for higher-order abstract syntax , 1997, Theoretical Computer Science.
[20] Furio Honsell,et al. pi-calculus in (Co)inductive-type theory , 2001, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[21] Joachim Parrow,et al. An introduction to the pi-calculus , 2001 .
[22] Andrew M. Pitts,et al. A First Order Theory of Names and Binding , 2001 .
[23] Frank Pfenning,et al. Higher-order abstract syntax , 1988, PLDI '88.
[24] James Brotherston,et al. A Formalised First-Order Con uence Proof for the λ-Calculus Using One-Sorted Variable Names (Barendregt Was Right after all ... almost) , 2001 .
[25] de Ng Dick Bruijn. Lambda calculus notation with nameless dummies, a tool for automatic formula manipulation, with application to the Church-Rosser theorem , 1972 .
[26] Dale Miller,et al. Reasoning in a logic with definitions and induction , 1997 .
[27] Lars Hallnäs. Partial inductive definitions , 1991 .
[28] Ian A. Mason,et al. Operational Techniques in PVS - A Preliminary Evaluation , 2001, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci..
[29] Andrew D. Gordon,et al. A Mechanisation of Name-Carrying Syntax up to Alpha-Conversion , 1993, HUG.
[30] Simon J. Gay. A Framework for the Formalisation of Pi Calculus Type Systems in Isabelle/HOL , 2001, TPHOLs.
[31] Thomas F. Melham. A Mechanized Theory of the Pi-Calculus in HOL , 1994, Nord. J. Comput..
[32] Furio Honsell,et al. A framework for defining logics , 1993, JACM.