Do Birds of a Feather Flock Higher? The Effects of Partner Similarity on Innovation in Strategic Alliances in Knowledge-Intensive Industries

In spite of the consensus on the benefits of strategic alliances for learning and innovation, our understanding of the effects of partner similarity remains conflicted. This paper develops an integrative theoretical framework in which we propose that similar partners in a focal firm's alliance portfolio contribute to the firm's innovation up to a threshold, beyond which additional similar partners can lead to a decrease in innovation because of the trade-offs embedded in collaboration between similar partners. In this integrative framework, we also draw on organizational ecology and institutional perspectives to propose that the effect of partner similarity on innovation is positively moderated by organizational aging and the industry norm of collaboration at the firm's founding. Results from an analysis of 176 biotechnology firms between 1988 and 1999 support our arguments. This study contributes to research on strategic alliance and innovation by considering both the benefits and costs of partner similarity in the context of alliance portfolios and by exploring the multilevel contingencies for the effects of partner similarity.

[1]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[2]  Nils Stieglitz,et al.  Innovations and the Role of Complementarities in a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[3]  Harry G. Barkema,et al.  Organizational Learning and diversification , 1994 .

[4]  Nadine Roijakkers,et al.  Inter-Firm R&D Networks: The Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High-Tech Partnership Formation , 2006 .

[5]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[6]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[7]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Innovation, Appropriability, And The Underpricing Of Initial Public Offerings , 2007 .

[8]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[10]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[11]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[12]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[13]  M. Ruef,et al.  The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  D. Austin,et al.  An Event-Study Approach to Measuring Innovative Output: The Case of Biotechnology , 1993 .

[15]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[16]  Geert Duysters,et al.  *Alliance Capability as a Mediator between Experience and Alliance Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the Alliance Capability Development Process , 2005 .

[17]  Mark de Rond,et al.  On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[19]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[20]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Interorganizational Relations: A Review of the Field. , 1981 .

[21]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[22]  David L. Deephouse.  To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[23]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[24]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[26]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[27]  P. Kale,et al.  The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: a study of firms in lithuania , 2006 .

[28]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[29]  Brian S. Silverman,et al.  Alliance-Based Competitive Dynamics , 2002 .

[30]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[31]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[32]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[33]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[35]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[36]  G. Ziggers,et al.  Dynamics of Cooperation: At the Brink of Irrelevance , 2006 .

[37]  K. Ramaswamy.  The performance impact of strategic similarity in horizontal mergers: Evidence from the U.S. banking industry , 1997 .

[38]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The Organizational Ecology of Strategic Groups in the American Brewing Industry from 1975 to 1990 , 1992 .

[39]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[40]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Creating a Hybrid Organizational Form from Parental Blueprints: The Emergence and Evolution of Knowledge Firms , 2000 .

[41]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[42]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[43]  F. Kellermanns,et al.  Disentangling Alliance Management Processes: Decision Making, Politicality, and Alliance Performance , 2008 .

[44]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[45]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[46]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[48]  Brent D. Beal,et al.  The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions , 1999 .

[49]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[50]  Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Patent Litigation in the Semiconductor Industry , 2007 .

[51]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[52]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[53]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[55]  Michael Hannan,et al.  Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms , 2000 .

[56]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[57]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[58]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[59]  Matthew S. Kraatz.  Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change , 1998 .

[60]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[61]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[62]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[63]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[64]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[65]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[67]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[68]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  LEVEL AND DISPERSION OF SATISFACTION IN TEAMS: USING FOCI AND SOCIAL CONTEXT TO EXPLAIN THE SATISFACTION-ABSENTEEISM RELATIONSHIP , 2007 .

[69]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[70]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[71]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry , 1991 .

[72]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[73]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[74]  P. Beamish,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE S-CURVE HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .